JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the appellant as also the learned counsel for the respondent-State.
(2.) This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 23.09.1992 and order of sentence dated 24.09.1992, passed by
learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No.
219 of 1988, whereby, appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 302 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code and has been
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 of
the Indian Penal Code and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five
years under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the sentences
were directed to run concurrently.
(3.) Prosecution case, as stated in the written report of informant- Makbul Miyan, is that he used to work at bakery in Barhi. On 20.04.1987,
at 6:00 a.m. his co-villager Sahdul Mian communicated to him that his
two daughters Guddi, aged four years and Butkani, aged two years had
died at about 2:00 a.m. On receiving this information, informant
immediately rushed back to his village and learnt from his wife that on
19.04.1987, around 3:00 p.m., she had gone to visit her sister at village Dhamna for procuring some money from her, however, when she returned from Dhamna, her eldest daughter, aged six years, informed
that her that aunty (chachi), wife of Israil Mian, had given her sisters something to drink (sharbat)
and after consuming the same, both the girls started vomiting and died at about 2:00 a.m. Four
hens that had consumed the vomit, had also died. Eldest daughter had not consumed the drink
offered. It is alleged that the aunt had offered poison laced drinks to the deceased daughters and
committed murder. Thereafter, first information was registered as Chouparan P.S. Case No.
49/1987, corresponding to G.R. No. 203/87. Police investigated the same and submitted charge-sheet against the appellant. The case was committed to the Court of Session, and was
ultimately tried by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh, who convicted the
appellant for the offence under Sections 302 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced her to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous
imprisonment for five years under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment of conviction
dated 23.09.1992 and order of sentence dated 24.09.1992. Both the sentences were directed to run
concurrently.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.