JUDGEMENT
PER JUSTICE ANANDA SEN, J. -
(1.) These 7 (seven) criminal appeals, filed by 11 convicts have been heard together and are being disposed of by this
common judgment as the same arise out of the same Judgment of
conviction and Order of sentence.
(2.) The appellants herein have been found guilty for offences under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code by Judgment of
conviction dated 19.01.2005 passed in Sessions Case No.39 of 2003 / 64 of
2000 by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Godda. After finding these appellants guilty under Sections 148 and 302/149
of the Indian Penal Code, by an order dated 19.01.2005, all these appellants
have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for
offence under Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code and imprisonment for
life along with a fine of Rs.5000/- for the offence under Sections 302/149 of
the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine amount, they are also to
undergo simple imprisonment for one month.
(3.) The prosecution case is based upon the fardbeyan of Dilip Kumar Mahto (P.W.10), which was recorded at 11.50 Hrs. on 05.09.1999. The
prosecution case in brief is that on 05.09.1999, at about 06.00 a.m. Dhiraj
Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 285 of 2005] came to the house of the informant and requested his father Sheo Pujan Mahto (deceased) to
accompany him to Thakurgangti Police Station for some urgent work. Sheo
Pujan Mahto accompanied said Dhiraj Mahto on a cycle at about 07.00 a.m.
When Sheo Pujan Mahto did not return, the informant got anxious and
informed his uncle Nagendra Prasad Mahto and his cousin grandfather
Kashinath Mahto. These three persons then went out in search of Sheo
Pujan Mahto on foot. When they reached near the tank of Bihari Village at
about 10.45 a.m., they saw, the informant's father coming alone riding his
cycle. When Sheo Pujan Mahto reached near the Mango trees of Bihari
Maidan, the accused Sadanand Thakur son of Shibu Thakur [appellant in Cr.
Appeal No. 891 of 2006] Gopal Mahto son of Vijay Mahto [appellant in Cr.
Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005), Jitu Mahto son of Bhagwan Mahto
[appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 264 of 2005], Permanand Mahto
[appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 278 of 2005), Shyam Lal Mahto son of
Panchdeo Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 278 of 2005], Dev
Narayan Mahto son of late Samroo Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.
207 of 2005], Budhinath Mahto (Sarpanch) [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005), Yogesh Mahto son of Narayan Mahto [appellant in Cr.
Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005], Beloon Mahto son of Dayal Mahto and Koila
Mahto [appellant in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 207 of 2005] and 6-7 unknown
persons suddenly came out and surrounded his father. All these persons
were armed with deadly weapons like Pharsa, Garasa, Chheoni etc. Koila
Mahto and Dev Narayan Mahto caught hold of the cycle of the deceased,
then Shyam Lal Mahto and Jeetu Mahto assaulted him on the back of his
head by Chheoni and Garasa as a result of which, Shiv Pujan Mahto fell
down from his cycle. No sooner he fell from his cycle, Parmanand Mahto,
Sadanand Thakur, Budhinath Mahto, Yogesh Mahto, Beloon Mahto and
Gopal Mahto pinned him down on the road along with the cycle and
Parmanand Mahto, who was armed with a chheoni, severed the neck of
Shiv Pujan Mahto and separated the head from the body. On seeing this, the
informant and the two persons accompanying him screamed and shouted
for help, but no one came to help them. On seeing the informant, 4-5
aggressors chased the informant, as a result of which the informant ran
towards Bihari Village and thereafter, these appellants and others went
towards the eastern side of the field shouting "Shanti Pal Jindabad" slogans
and throwing pamphlets. Thereafter, this informant, his uncle and cousin
grandfather went near the deceased and saw the deceased lying on the
road in a pool of blood. The right leg of the deceased was under the bicycle
and left leg was over the bicycle and his head was lying at a distance of few
feet. Some portion of the chheoni (weapon) was also lying on the ground.
Several pamphlets were scattered at the place of occurrence. The informant
further narrated that his uncle Nagendra Prasad Mahto and his son
Krityanand Mahto had filed a criminal case against some of the accused
persons previously and they were convicted in that case and when they
came out from custody, after grant of bail, they committed this heinous
crime. He further stated that his family was always against naxalites,
therefore, the naxalites were also making conspiracy to kill them.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.