BAL KISHUN SAO Vs. MD. USMAN
LAWS(JHAR)-2017-1-48
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on January 12,2017

Bal Kishun Sao Appellant
VERSUS
MD. USMAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Aparesh Kumar Singh, J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) There is an interim order operating since 19.02.2004 wherein proceedings in Title Appeal No. 43 of 1996 pending in the Court of 6th Additional District Judge, Giridih has been stayed. On the previous occasion counsel for the petitioner was present, however, since there was no representation on behalf of the respondents, the matter was adjourned.
(3.) Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 25.09.2003 passed in Title Appeal No. 43 of 1996 where-under the application under Order 41, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure for adducing additional evidence of certified copies of two sale deeds dated 01.03.1976 and 23.12.1978 have been rejected. Learned Appellate Court after discussion on the application of the petitioner and taking note of the background facts has held that such additional evidence could not be allowed at that stage rather that can be considered at the time of final hearing of the Appeal. Petition under Order 41, Rule 27 of the CPC was, however, rejected directing the parties to come ready for hearing of the appeal on 12.11.2003.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.