SMT. ASHA KUNWAR Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(JHAR)-2017-2-92
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on February 15,2017

Smt. Asha Kunwar Appellant
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

AMITAV K.GUPTA, J. - (1.) This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 20.08.2013 passed in Case no. OA/IIU/RNC/2011/0051, by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Ranchi Bench, whereby the appellants/claimants' application for compensation was dismissed.
(2.) The claimants/appellants filed the claim application stating that Sunil Paswan, the husband and father of the claimants was travelling on Mumbai-Howrah Mail from Kalyan Junction to Dehri-On-Sone. That in the intervening night of 13/14.01.2011, he fell down from the train and died on spot due to the injuries sustained on account of the fall. The copies of the station memo, FIR, post mortem report, final report and the journey ticket were filed with the application.
(3.) Learned counsel, for the appellants/claimants, submitted that the Tribunal has arrived at a conclusive finding that the deceased was a bona-fide passenger travelling on a valid ticket, but, dismissed the claim application on the ground that in the inquiry report, Ext. R2, submitted by the DRM, it has been stated that the deceased must have fallen down as he was travelling while standing at the open door of the compartment and he fell due to his own negligence which comes within the purview of exceptions (a) to (e) of Section 124(A) of the Railways Act, 1989, therefore, the Railways were not liable to pay the compensation. It is argued that no oral or documentary evidence has been brought on record by the respondent/Railways, to establish that the untoward incident took place on account of negligence of the deceased or he was in a state of intoxication or insane or it was a suicidal act for exonerating the Railways from the liability to pay the statutory compensation. It is contended by the learned counsel that the Supreme Court in the case of Jameela and Others v. Union of India reported in (2010), Acci. C.R. 1069 SC, in similar facts had held that the Railways/respondents cannot be exonerated from paying the statutory compensation. It is argued that the claimants are entitled to compensation in terms of Railways Accident and Untoward Incident (Compensation) Amendment Rules, 2016 whereby, the statutory amount of compensation has been enhanced from Rs. 4,00,000/- (Four Lakhs) to Rs. 8,00,000/- (Eight Lakhs). ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.