INDIRA DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2007-11-47
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on November 19,2007

INDIRA DEVI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the petitioners learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Opposite -Party No. 2.
(2.) THIS application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 5.5.2005 passed by Sessions Judge, Chatra whereby order passed by the Court below refusing to take cognizance against the petitioners was set aside and consequently the matter was remanded to the Court below for further enquiry and also for quashing the order dated 4.1.2006 whereby cognizance of the offence under Sections 465 and 120 - B of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that Opposite - Party No. 2 had filed a complaint against the petitioners wherein it was alleged that the petitioners playing fraud got the sale -deed executed but the Court below did not take any cognizance as the Court did not find any criminal case being made out against the petitioners and that order was challenged before the Sessions Judge, Chatra and the learned Sessions Judge without hearing the petitioners set aside the order whereby the Court had refused to take cognizance of the offence and remanded the matter for further enquiry and also the Court below without hearing took cognizance of the offence and hence, the petitioners have filed this Criminal Miscellaneous application.
(3.) LEARNED counsel appearing for the petitioners by referring Section 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure submits that it was mandatory on the part of the revisional Court to hear the petitioners against whom the Court below had not taken any cognizance of the offence and, therefore, order passed by the revisional Court as well as order taking cognizance of the offence against the petitioners are bad. Learned counsel in this respect refers a decision passed by this Court in a case of Ramsewak Choudhary V/s. State of Jharkhand and another, in Cr. M.P. No. 369 of 2003 and also a reported decision rendered in a case of Sayeed Bhagat and others V/s. State of Bihar and another reported in 1999 BCCR 661.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.