JUDGEMENT
M.Y.EQBAL, J. -
(1.) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8.8.2003 passed in W.P. (C) No. 6088 of 2001 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent was disposed of holding that
the writ petitioner is entitled to honorarium for the period June, 2000 to May, 2001.
(2.) THE petitioner -respondent filed a writ petition seeking a direction upon the respondents - appellants for a direction for payment of honorarium -cum -salary for the services rendered by him in
terms of letter dated 20.6.2000. The petitioner's case was that on or about 15.12.1982, he
was appointed on the post of Security Officer under the respondents -C.C.L. and later on promoted
to the post of Senior Security Inspector in 1990. He superannuated from the services on
20.6.2000. It was stated that after retirement, a proposal was made by the Chief of Security, C.C. L. for rendering training to 700 security personnel for a period of one year on honorarium basis
fixing a sum of Rs. 3000.00 per month.
Such proposal was made by the Director of the appellants -Central Coalfields Ltd, who in
turn, while concurring the proposal of Chief of Security, sent the record to the Chairman -
cum -Managing Director on 5.6.2000. According to the writ petitioner, the said proposal
was approved by the Chairman -cum -Managing Director. The petitioner's case was
that on the basis of decision of the Management, a letter dated 20.6.2000 was issued
offering him to serve as a Trainer on a consolidated honorarium of Rs. 3000.00 per
month for a period of one year. In terms of the letter; the petitioner said to have
tendered his acceptance vide letter dated 20.6.2000. Accordingly, the petitioner alleged
to have been engaged as a trainer in CCL Headquarter, Ranchi and he trained 562
security personnel in the year 2000 -2001. The writ petitioner's further case was
that he was not paid a single farthing for such training duty.
The appellants, who were respondents in the writ petition, filed counter affidavit stating, inter alia, that though a proposal was initiated for utilization of services of the writ petitioner for one year
after his superannuation from services for imparting training to the security personnel of C.C.L. and
the same was recommended by the higher authorities, but after doing all the formalities, the
proposal was sent to the Board of Central Coalfields Ltd. for final approval of the engagement of
the writ petitioner. The Board of Directors at its 295th meeting, approved the said proposal for a
period of six months only from 1st October, 2000 which was conveyed to the appellants vide letter
dated 12.10.2000. Since it took considerable time in between initiation of proposal and approval of
the Board of the Central Coalfields Ltd., the writ petitioner was not given any order for his
engagement and consequently, the training was never conducted by the writ petitioner as he was
never engaged for the job.
(3.) THE main question that falls for consideration is whether the writ petitioner, pursuant to the approval of his appointment as trainer, was engaged and he conducted training for the period in
question. The learned Single Judge, on the basis of annexure -4, held that the petitioner -
respondent was allowed to work from 26.6.2000 to 22.5.2001. From perusal of annexure -4 to the
writ petition, it appears that it mentions the dates only during which the training programme was
conducted in the year 2000 -2001. In this connection, paragraphs -11 & 12 of the writ petition are
worth to be quoted herein below:
11. That accordingly, the petitioner was engaged as Trainer in CCL, Headquarters, Ranchi. He rendered training to 562 security personnel in the year 2000 -2001. He has
prepared a chart showing the details of such period of training.
12. That it would not be out of place to mention here that although a sum of Rs. 3000.00 was fixed as honorarium payable to the petitioner in lieu of his services rendered as Trainer pursuant to Annexure -2 issued on the basis of a not sheet as
contained in Annexure -1, but the petitioner has not been paid a farthering for such
training.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.