JUDGEMENT
R.N.VERMA,J. -
(1.) The claimants/appellants have preferred this appeal
against the judgment dated 23.08.2013 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal,
Ranchi in case no. OA(iiU)/RNC/2010/0104 old no OU-70028/07, whereby and
where under the claim application filed by the claimants has been
dismissed.
(2.) The brief facts, as it appears from the record is that Sunil Kumar (since deceased) son of the present claimants/appellants while boarding
the train no. 9306, Sipra Express at Dhanbad fell down accidentally
between the gap of platform and the train. His body was crushed under the
wheels of the said train resulting in his instantaneous death. In
connection with the said untoward incident, the G.R.P. Dhanbad registered
U.D. Case no. 18 of 2006. Thereafter, Rail Thana P.S. Case no. 18 of 2006
dated 16.07.2006 was also instituted on the basis of the statement of one
Rabindra Nath Dubey that he received telephonic call from the Dhanbad
Railway Station in the mid-night on 15/16.07.2006 that his
brother-in-law, Sunil Kumar died due to fall from train. Immediately, he
rushed to Dhanbad railway station and received the dead-body of his
brother-in-law, who was aged about 22 years. It is also stated in the FIR
that his brother-in-law had come to Dhanbad from Deoghar and during his
boarding in Sipra Express he fell down and crushed under the wheels of
the train. It further appears from report submitted by Assistant
Sub-Inspector, Railway Police, Dhanbad dated 16.07.2006(R-5) that from
the pocket of the deceased Sunil Kumar, one Identity Card and a ticket
smeared with blood were recovered. It further appears from a report (R-2)
submitted to DRM that the said untoward incident took place at Dhanbad
Railway Station on 15.07.2006 where after an inquiry was conducted by the
RPF. The report reveals that the alleged victim had fallen down at
Dhanbad platform no.2 from 9306 UP Sipra Express while he was boarding
the train. The victim died on the spot since he was run over. But in this
report, recovery of any ticket particular has not been accepted. The said
report was accepted by the DRM. Therefore, there is no dispute about the
death of the deceased or untoward incident.
(3.) The respondent-Union of India, through General Manager East Central Railway, Hazipur in his written statement pleaded that no such accident
took place on 15.07.2006 , which would appear from the station diary.
Therefore, claimants have to put strict proof that the deceased was
travelling with a valid ticket.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.