JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 7 th August, 2004 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Seraikella in
connection with Sessions Trial Case no. 122 of 2003
corresponding to G.R. Case no. 353 of 2003, arising out of
Adityapur P Case no. 125 of 2003, whereby the appellant has
been held guilty for the offence punishable under sections 302
Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/ - and in
default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for six
months.
(2.) The facts emerges from the fard -beyan of Gangadhar Majhi (informant), is that, on 27.5.2003 at about 10 p.m. the
informant received message regarding death of his sister
Parvati Devi, who was married with appellant Sona Ram Majhi.
He came to know that his sister Parvati Devi has been killed by
her husband Sona Ram Majhi (appellant) who had assaulted her
by means of Lathi and Tangi. The informant rushed to the house
of his sister Parvati Devi and found her dead lying on a cot. She
was having multiple injuries on her person. He could learn from
Pinki (daughter of deceased) that on petty cause of not
providing food in time, the appellant Sona Ram Majhi has killed
his wife Parvati Devi. The fard -beyan of informant Gangadhar
Majhi was recorded at 00:45 hrs. on 28.5.2003 and a case being
Adityapur P.S. Case no. 125 of 2003 dated 28.5.2003 U/Ss.
302,201 I.P.C. against the appellant was registered. The investigation was carried out, examination of
witnesses were taken, inquest report was prepared, post -
mortem was conducted on the dead body of Parvati and after
securing attendance of the appellant, charge sheet was
submitted and, accordingly, cognizance of the offence was
taken and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and
registered as Sessions Trial Case no. 122 of 2003.
(3.) The charges U/Ss. 302, 201 I.P.C. against the appellant Sona Ram Majhi were framed, to which he pleaded not guilty
and claimed to be tried.
To substantiate the charges the prosecution has
examined altogether eleven witnesses including informant,
doctor, investigating officer and the daughter of deceased. The
learned Additional Sessions Judge placing reliance on the
evidence and documents available on record, held the appellant
Sona Ram Majhi guilty for the offence punishable under section
302 I.P.C. and sentenced him as indicated above. The appellant stood acquitted from the charge
framed under section 201 I.P.C.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.