MD. QUIYAMUDDIN KHAN & COMPANY Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2016-8-27
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 22,2016

Md. Quiyamuddin Khan And Company Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Invoking the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ,,the Code) the petitioner - company through its partner has moved this Court for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the F.I.R. being Vigilance P.S. Case No.20 of 2012 which was instituted under Sections 409, 420, 201, 109, 120B, 468 and 469 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act.
(2.) Bereft of unnecessary details, the facts which is relevant for the proper adjudication of the issue involved in this case, in short, is that on the basis of written report of one Ram Sagar, Deputy Director, Welfare Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, the aforesaid vigilance case was instituted with allegations that an area of 0.75 acres of Plot No.167 appertaining to Khata No.164 of Mouza -Kadri was transferred to the Welfare Department for construction of Haj House at an estimated cost of Rs.4,88,72,700/ -. The work was handed over to be executed by the Jharkhand State Housing Board. Whereafter the construction work was started on 17.07.2007 but on 20.09.2009 when the casting of portico of the Haj House was going on, the entire structure of portico collapsed causing injury to nine labourers. Due to fall of the said portico, the authority presumed that construction of Haj House was sub -standard and irregularities have been committed by the engineers as well as contractors. Thereafter, the State Government handed over the investigation to Vigilance, who entrusted the inquiry to a Technical Expert Committee and the said Committee after inquiry submitted the report showing irregularity, negligence, lack of control over the construction work and non -approval of Architectural Drawing. On the basis of the said report, the aforesaid case was instituted as indicated above showing this petitioner and others as accused.
(3.) It would be proper to mention here that for the same offence one F.I.R. bearing Doranda/Argora P.S. Case No.371 of 2009 was earlier instituted immediately after the collapse of the portico by one Belal Khan as informant. However, during investigation of this case, the matter was handed over to the State Vigilance, whereafter the Vigilance Case No.20 of 2012 was instituted on 12.09.2012. The Vigilance Department started investigation based on the allegation made in the second F.I.R. and the investigation is still pending. Hence, this criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Code for quashing of entire criminal proceeding as well as the second F.I.R. lodged at the instance of Vigilance being Vigilance P.S. Case No.20 of 2012.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.