JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) In both the writ petitions, the common order dated 5.5.2003 passed by the Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag
in Land Restoration Revision No. 62 of 2002 and 63 of 2002 are under
challenge where under he has set aside the order dated 25.6.2002
passed by the Additional Collector, Chatra in Land Restoration Appeal
No. 98 of 2002 and 99 of 2002 and has also set aside the order dated
8.5.2002 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (S.D.O.), Chatra in Land Restoration Case No. 2/1994 -95 and 1/1994 -95. Petitioner in both the
writ petitions are the same while the private respondents are
different. In the Land Revision Case No. 62/02, restoration of plot no.
27, 32, 61, 77, 78,98,99, 105, 106, 116, 118, 188 and 189 involving 9.80 acres of Khata no. 7 and in Revision No. 63/02, restoration for plot no. 18,29,30,63,82,90,185,180, 242,195, 204, 205, 302,307, 350
of Khata no. 12 measuring an area of 9.46 acres of village
Mangardaha, P.S. Piparwar District Chatra were in question. Petitioner
claimed to be a Tribal Tenant whose name was recorded in the
cadestral survey records and continued in possession over the
aforesaid piece of land till he was dispossessed sometime in the year
1982 -83 by the private respondents leading to the institutions of Land Restoration cases in the year 1984 -85.
(3.) It is incidental to state herein that the order dated 8.5.2002 passed by the Land Restoration Officer is on remand by the
Additional Collector, Hazaribag. It is also relevant to mention here
and as is evident from the impugned orders and the pleadings on
record that the land in question stood acquired by the Central
Coalfields Limited sometime in the year 1985 and compensation as
well as employment has been given to the private respondents. The
private respondents set up a plea before the inferior authority that
the Tribal tenant failed to deposit the rent to the Zamindar and
surrendered their land where after by way of a Hukumnaka on
10.5.1937, the land was settled in favour of the ancestors of the private respondents who made the land cultivable and paid rent to
the Zamindar. The Zamindar filed his return after vesting which refer
to the plots given in settlement to the ancestors of the private
respondents. It is their case that it is only in 1984 that the petitioner
filed a petition for restoration of the land in question in order to make
a claim for job in Piparwar Project under C.C.L after the acquisition
was over. The restoration case was registered as 16/1985 -86 and
27/1986 -87 before the Deputy Collector, Land Reform who dismissed the claim of the petitioner. Thereafter the Additional Collector, Chatra
remanded the case to the S.D.O, Chatra who heard and passed the
order dated 8.5.2002 allowing the restoration in favour of the Tribal
applicant i.e. petitioner herein. The Additional Collector, Chatra
dismissed the appeal at the admission stage and thereafter the
private respondents preferred the revision petition before the
Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag from whose
order the instant writ petition arises.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.