JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16 th
February,2006 and 17th February, 2006 respectively, passed by
Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Latehar in connection with
Sessions Case no. 0011 of 2004 corresponding to G.R. Case no.
126 of 2003, arising out of Manika P.S. Case no. 10 of 2003, whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence
punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay
fine of Rs. 20,000/ - and in default of making payment of fine
further simple imprisonment for one year.
(2.) The fact emerges from the fard -beyan of Nirmala Kumari, recorded on 10.4.2003 at 14:00 hrs. is that on 9.4.2003
when the informant returned home from market she found her
uncle Deonandan Singh (appellant) present in the house. It is
disclosed that appellant Deonandan Singh was working as
Assistant Engineer in Telecommunication Department, Ranchi.
All the family members including the informant slept in the
house after having their meal. At about 3 a.m. in the morning
the informant woke up after hearing some knocking and
groaning sound of her mother. When she turned towards bed of
her mother, she found that her uncle Deonandan Singh
(appellant) has been inflicting blows upon her mother by means
of tangi causing injuries to her. The informant intervened and
snatched away the axe from the hands of Deognandan Singh
(appellant) and raised alarm but, till then the appellant fled
away from the place of occurrence. The informant followed the
appellant to some distance but, could not succeed to apprehend
him. On the basis of fard -beyan of informant Nirmala Kumari
PW -6 Manika P.S. Case no. 10 of 2003 U/s 302 I.P.C. was
registered against the appellant Deonandan Singh.
The Police after due investigation submitted charge
sheet and accordingly cognizance of the offence was taken and
the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and registered
as Sessions Case no. 0011 of 2004.
(3.) The appellant stood charged for the offence punishable under section 302 Indian Penal Code to which he
pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
To substantiate the charge the prosecution has
examined altogether eight witnesses and proved documents like
fard -beyan, inquest report, post -mortem report, seizure list etc.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge placing reliance on the
evidence and documents available, held the appellant guilty for
the offence punishable under section 302 IPC and sentenced
him as indicated above.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.