JUDGEMENT
APARESH KUMAR SINGH,J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 3166 of 2015 are the legal heirs of original defendant no. 1, who have been substituted after his death on
11.05.2014 at the instance of plaintiff/respondent herein through petition dated 15.05.2014. Their substitution was allowed vide order
dated 23.05.2014. Petitioners herein had made an application to file
written statement on 14.11.2014, which has been declined vide impugned
order dated 12.06.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Sr.
Division-VI, Jamshedpur in Title (Partition) Suit No. 101 of 2007.
(3.) In W.P. (C) No. 294 of 2016, the same petitioners i.e. substituted heirs of deceased defendant no. 1 had made a prayer to set aside the
order dated 11.04.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Sr.
Division-VI, Jamshedpur in the same Title (Partition) Suit No. 101 of
2007 where under the original defendant no. 1(now deceased) namely Raghunath Prasad was debarred from filing written statement. They have
also impugned the order dated 08.05.2014 rejecting the prayer to recall
the order of debarment dated 11.04.2014. The said defendant as noticed
here in above has died on 11.05.2014. Petitioners after being substituted
at the instance of plaintiff sought permission to file written statement
and on being denied have approached this Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.