KISHUN PRASAD VERMA SON OF KANHAIYA PRASAD SWARNKAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2016-7-186
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on July 14,2016

Kishun Prasad Verma Son Of Kanhaiya Prasad Swarnkar Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Ananda Sen, J. - (1.) The petitioner is praying for regularization of his services in Grade-IV i.e. the post of Driver, as he has worked regularly, on the said post in the office of Primary Health Centre, Bagodar.
(2.) The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on 16.7.1990 as Daily Wages Employee on the recommendation of the then Health Minister. As per Annexure-1 to the writ petition, is the appointment letter. The petitioner was working in the office of the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Giridih. Counsel for the petitioner, further submits, that prior to 1990, the petitioner was working in the Bihar Relief Committee from December, 1973 and to substantiate his submission, the counsel for the petitioner relies upon Annexure-3 to the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner worked regularly till filing of this writ petition i.e. till the year 2004 and, thereafter, no work was taken from him. Counsel for the petitioner lastly submits that he should be regularized and the department should treat him as a permanent employee.
(3.) Counsel for the State, opposes the prayer, relying upon the several paragraphs of the counter affidavit. He submits that the petitioner's claim as driver cannot be accepted. Counsel for the State further submits that the Driving Licence of the petitioner is forged and cannot be relied upon. The Licence was granted to him in August 1973 when the petitioner was merely nine years old. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the claim of the petitioner, that he was working since December 1973 in the Bihar Relief Committee, also cannot be accepted, because as per the School Leaving Certificate of the petitioner, his date of birth is 4.1.1964. This means at the relevant time, his age was only nine years. Counsel for the petitioner lastly submits that all the documents, annexed to this petition, have been manufactured only for the purpose of making out a case, but the petitioner has miserable failed to do so.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.