JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11 th
March, 2003 and 12th March, 2003, respectively, passed by
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court -II, Pakur
in connection with Sessions Trial No.129 of 2002/140 of 2002, corresponding to G.R. No.335 of 2002, arising out of
Littipara P.S. Case No.28 of 2002, whereby the appellant
has been held guilty for the offence punishable under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.
(2.) The fact, emerging from the Fardbeyan of Karmi Murmu, recorded on 26th June, 2002, at 14:15 hours, is that during
previous night, at about 2:00 a.m., the informant woke up
on hearing alarm raised by Merang Maie Tudu (deceased).
It is disclosed that the informant has adopted the appellant -
Sual Hembrom as her son and the appellant was living with
his wife -Merang Maie Tudu with the informant. After the
informant woke up, she saw the appellant causing assault
to his wife -Merang Maie Tudu by means of club. When the
informant wanted to intervene, she was threatened.
Somehow the informant escaped from the place and
collected the villagers to save the life of Merang Maie Tudu,
but till then the appellant bolted the house from inside.
When the villagers assembled and wanted to extend help to
Merang Maie Tudu, the appellant jumped out of the window
and fled away.
On the basis of Fardbeyan of Karmi Murmu, Littipara
P.S. Case No.28 of 2002 dated 26th June, 2002 under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellant
was registered.
The police after due investigation submitted charge
sheet and, accordingly, cognizance was taken and case was
committed to the court of sessions and registered as
Sessions Trial No.129 of 2002.
(3.) Charge under Section 302 IPC against the appellant was framed to which he pleased not guilty and claimed to be
tried.
The prosecution, in order to substantiate the charge,
has examined eight witnesses, including the doctor,
Investigating Officer and the informant.
Learned Trial Judge considering the evidences and
documents available on record held the appellant guilty for
the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and inflicted
sentence as indicated above.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.