JUDGEMENT
PRASHANT KUMAR,J. -
(1.) This revision application is directed against
the order dated 21.07.2014, passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Giridih, in
T.R. No.496 A of 2014, whereby and where under he directed the petitioner
to physically appear before his court on the next date for framing of
charge.
(2.) It is submitted by Sri Nitin Kumar Pasari, learned counsel for the petitioner that as per Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 any
offence enumerated under Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the
Electricity Act, 2003 can be tried by a Special Court. He further submits
that as per Sub-Section 3 of Section 153 of the aforesaid Act, a
Magistrate is not qualified to be appointed as a Special Judge. The
aforesaid Section specifically states that for becoming a Special Judge,
it is necessary that incumbent shall immediately before his appointment
worked as an Additional District and Sessions Judge. Accordingly, he
submits that the learned S.D.J.M., Giridih has no power to try the
present offence, because the same relates to an offence alleged to have
been committed under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
(3.) Sri Rahul Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the informant-JUVNL submits that even a Magistrate can try the case in the absence of a
Special Judge as per the direction of the District Judge.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.