JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By Court: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred by
appellant from jail against the judgment of conviction and
order of sentence dated 19th September, 2005, passed by 1st
Additional Sessions Judge, Pakur in connection with
Sessions Case no. 154 of 2004 corresponding to G.R. Case
no. 341 of 2004 arising out of Pakur (M) P Case no. 160 of
2004, whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 325 of the
Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/ - and in
default of payment of fine further imprisonment for one
year u/s 302 Indian Penal Code and further sentenced to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay
fine of Rs. 1,000/ - and in default of payment of fine further
imprisonment for three months u/s 325 Indian Penal Code.
(2.) The case of the prosecution as it appear from the fard -beyan of Chhitta Marandi recorded on 28.8.2004 at
6:00 hrs. at village Dharsundi within P Pakur (Muffasil) is that one day prior to the date of recording of fard -beyan i.e.
on Friday appellant Babesh Murmu caused assault to
Gurgu Murmu (husband of informant) by means of iron rod
causing injury to Gurgu Murmu. Further blow of iron rod
was inflicted on his leg. When the informant came to rescue
her husband she was also assaulted by means of iron rod
and she sustained fracture injury on her hand. The reason
behind the occurrence has been assigned that appellant
Babesh Murmu and deceased Gurgu Murmu are own
brothers and Gurgu Murmu (deceased) had been alleging
that the appellant had eaten a chicken belonging to him. On
the basis of fard -beyan Pakur (Muffasil) P Case No. 160 of
2004 under sections 302,307 Indian Penal Code was registered. The Police after due investigation submitted
charge sheet and accordingly cognizance of the offence was
taken and the case committed to the Court of Sessions and
registered as Sessions Case no. 154 of 2004.
(3.) The appellant stood charged for the offence punishable under section 302 and 307 Indian Penal Code.
Contents of the charges were read over and explained to
the appellant to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to
be tried.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.