JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal arises
against the judgment dated 9-9-1997 passed
by Sri Hari Shankar Prasad, Sessions Judge,
Dumka in Sessions Case Nos. 177 of 1989/
203 of 1990, whereby he convicted all the
six appellants for commission of the offence
under Section 304, II of the Indian Penal
Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I.
for a period of 5 years each for the said offence.
All the appellants, except appellant
No. 6 Hansi Devi, have further been convicted for committing the offence under
Section 323 of the IPC but no separate sentence was passed.
(2.) The prosecution case in short is that
PW-7 Budhan Maharana gave a fardbeyan
on 9-4-1987 alleging therein that on 8-4-
1987 at about 6.00 P.M. all the appellants
came at the door of the informant complaining
that the she goat of the father of the
informant had eaten up pumpkin plant of the
accused persons and then they started abusing
and assaulting the informant's father
with Lathi and slaps. The informant's father
raised alarm, at this the informant and his
mother came to rescue Dewali Maharana
(the father of the informant) and then it is
said that the informant and his mother were
also assaulted by the accused persons. On
the basis of the said report the F.I.R. was
registered under Sections 147 and 323 of
the I.P.C. However, since the injured Dewali
Maharana died subsequently and, as such,
Section 304 of the IPC was added. After investigation,
charge sheet was submitted under
Section 304/323 IPC and, thereafter,
they were put on trial.
(3.) In order to establish the charges, altogether eight witnesses were examined on
behalf of the prosecution and one witness examined on behalf of the defence also, PW-1
is Dr. Sita Ram Sah, who examined the injuries on Sitia Devi (PW-6) and found a
lacerated wound on the right side of forehead
caused by hard and blunt substance. He also
examined injuries on the informant Budhan
Maharana. PW-2 is Dr. K. D. Singh, who held
Post Mortem examination on the dead body
of the deceased Dewali Maharana. PW-3 is
Milkhi Devi, is the daughter of the informant
and is an eyewitness to occurrence. PW-4 is
Kauleshwari Devi, the wife of the informant
Budhan Maharana (PW-7) and she is also
an eyewitness to the occurrence. PW-5 has
been tendered. PW-6 is Sitia Devi, wife of
the deceased and the mother of the informant and also an eyewitness to the
occurrence. PW-7 is the informant Budhan
Maharana whereas PW-8 is a formal witness,
who has formally proved the F.I.R. The Investigating Officer was not examined.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.