JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) All the appellants stand
convicted for the offence under Sections
304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and
sentenced to serve imprisonment for seven
years and one year respectively by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, Khunti
(Ranchi) in Sessions Trial No. 180 of 1997.
Since both the appeals arise out of the same
judgment, they are taken up together for disposal on merit.
(2.) Briefs facts leading to their conviction
are that the informant Shatrughan Mahto
in the night of 20-9-1996 stated before
Bundu Police along with the dead body of
his sister's daughter that deceased Sharthi
Devi was married with appellant
Bhuneshwar Mahto in the month of Baisakh
of 1992 according to Hindu custom after
giving dowry as per their capacity. However,
after sometimes the appellant started asking
for colour television, Godrej Almirah and
further cash from said Sharthi Devi. According
to the informant, these facts were reported to the parents of the deceased. It is
further stated that in the evening of 20-9-1996,
appellant Bhuneshwar Mahto came
to the house of the informant in a Maruti
Van and asked where about of his wife
Sharthi Devi. Getting suspicious on the
moves of appellant Bhuneshwar Mahto, the
informant along with others proceeded in
search of Sharthi Devi and during that
course, her body was recovered from the well
of the appellant. Further case of the prosecution is that
the deceased was found having her neck tied with sari and one heavy
stone, used as roller in flour making (Attachakki).
The dead body was brought out in
presence of the informant with the help of
the villagers and the matter was reported to
the police. According to the informant,
Sharthi Devi was killed by the appellants
just because he could not satisfy the demand
of dowry and thrown in the well.
(3.) The police after recording the statement, prepared the inquest report and
lodged Bundu P.S. Case No. 125 of 1996
under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal
code. The dead body was sent for post
mortem examination and investigation was
taken up. After completion of the investigation,
the police finally submitted charge-sheet against all the appellants to face trial.
Their case was committed to the Court of
Sessions for their trial. The learned trial
Court framed charges against all
the appellants under Sections 304B and 201 of the
Indian Penal Code on 6-8-1999. The trial
Court after examining the witnesses and
considering the defence, found and held all
the appellants guilty for the offences under
Sections 304B/201/34 of the Indian Penal
Code and sentenced them to serve imprisonment for seven
years and one year respectively.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.