JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Both the appellants
stands convicted under Section 395 of the
Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve
rigorous imprisonment for five years vide
judgment and order dated 10-4-2002 passed
in Sessions Trial No. 44 of 1992 by Additional
Sessions Judge, IXth, Dhanbad.
(2.) Brief facts leading to their conviction
are that in the night of 25-11-1990 when
the informant Sudhir Mandal was sleeping
in Mari shop situated at Pindrahat Mari.
along with P.W. 1 Kalo Bauri and P.W. 11
Sapan Mandal, some dacoits entered inside
the shop and started demanding money. He
could identify one Sufal Manjhi and the appellant
Yogeshwar Hembram, resident of
village- Kanadih amongst the dacoits. According to
them, these two persons used to come
to his shop for Mari. He further asserted that
he was physically assaulted while Sufal
Manjhi was threatening him with pistol and
carry away one old Hercules cycle, hundred
rupees in cash and some old clothes including
his red cornered Dhoti. It was further
alleged that the dacoits took away two pitchers
of Mari and one white Murga also. As
per the informant, in spite of his raising
alarms, none came to his rescue. He went
to report the matter to the shop owner in
village Shyamapur in the morning, who told
him to remain at the shop. However, at about
10.00 a.m. he came to know that in village
Kanadih, a dacoit was arrested while dacoity
was being committed. The informant
reached the village Kanadih to find that one
Shiv Lal Tudu has caught hold of a dacoit,
who was identified as Shivlal Murmu. This
Shivlal Murmu confessed in presence of the
villagers that he along with the appellants
had committed dacoity in the shop of the
informant also and thereafter trying dacoity
in the house of Shiv Lal Tudu, when he was
arrested. The informant has also recognized
the said Shivlal Murmu as one of the dacoits.
The police was informed and arrested Shivlal
Murmu handed over, after recording the
statement of the informant. Said Shiv Lal
Tudu also signed over the Fardbeyan as
witness. It is also stated that on disclosure
made by Shivlal Murmu houses of Sufal
Manjhi and Yogeshwar Hembram were
searched from where looted bicycles, old
clothes etc. were recovered.
(3.) The police registered Nirsa P.S. Case
No. 384 of 1990 and submitted charge-sheet
against five persons under Sections 335/412
of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants
were committed for trial by the Court of
Session where all the five persons were charged
under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code
and appellant Yogeshwar Hembram and
Sufal Manjhi was further charged under
Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The
trial Court examining the witnesses and after
appraisal of the evidence, finally came
to hold both the appellants and Sufal Manjhi
guilty under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
However, no separate sentence
was "passed under Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.