JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The sole appellant
Shamim Mian has preferred this appeal
against the judgement and order of conviction
dated 25-4-2001 and sentence dated
30.4.2001 passed by 1st Additional Sessions
Judge, Dumka in Sessions Case No. 52 of
1991 whereby and whereunder the appellant
has been held guilty for the offence
under section 304, Part-II of the Indian Penal
Code and has been sentenced to undergo
R.I. for four years and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in
default of which further period of six months'
R.I.
(2.) Brief facts leading to this appeal are
that in the night of 29/30-11-1989 the informant
Charku Mian along with his two
grandsons was sleeping inside a hut
situated in the fields of Mauza Champapur looking
after the paddy crop. Further stated, in
between 1-2 a.m. he felt someone was
assaulting him with sharp weapon on the leg.
According to the informant when he woke
up, he found the appellant along with his
father Ishaque Mian inside the hut. Thereafter
he was given two blows with dagger on
the right leg. The informant raised alarm on
which the minor grandsons of the informant
awoke and saw the appellants assaulting
him. In the meantime other witnesses also
assembled there. Thereafter the appellant
and his father fled away. According to the
informant, the appellant Shamim Mian was
married with his daughter Phalwano and
who due to torture and ill-treatment has left
the house of the appellant for which a
panchayati was held. Phalwano did not agree
to return to the house of the appellant which
was resented and he was threatened by the
appellant.
(3.) The informant was taken to
Narayanpur Police Station where his statement
was recorded by police on 30-11 -1989
and Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 88 of 1989
under Section 307, 324, 341 of the Indian
Penal Code was registered against both of
them. The police investigated the case and
finally submitted charge-sheet against the
appellant and his father under section 302
of the Indian Penal Code as the informant
died during his treatment after three weeks.
The learned CJM took cognizance in this
case and committed it for trial by the Court
of Session. During the pendency of the trial,
father of the appellant, Ishaque Mian died
and his case was dropped on 17.8.1994. The
appellant was thereafter charged under
section 302/323 of the Indian Penal Code in
the year 1994 to which he pleaded not guilty
and claimed false prosecution. The learned
trial court after examining the witnesses finally
came to conclude that the appellant
has assaulted the informant resulting in his
death for which he was held guilty under
Section 304, Part-II of the Indian Penal Code.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.