JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The accused appeals.
(2.) The appellant, Rajdeo Singh @
Bhanjan Singh @ Manjan Singh, was tried
and convicted under section 302 and on
being convicted, he was sentenced to imprisonment for life. The present appeal is
against the said conviction and sentence.
(3.) The facts necessary to dispose of this
appeal are as follows: Lalita Kumari, deceased in this case, is the daughter of P.W.4,
Beni Sahu. P.W.8, Gita Devi, is the mother
of the deceased. P.W. 1, Jitan Kumari, is the
friend of the deceased. The deceased and
Jitan Kumari, P.W. 1, went to Jungle at
about 3.00 p.m. on 14-4-1994 to collect
dead woods. After collecting dead woods,
they were returning to their house with
bundles of wood on their head. When they
were on their way to the house, the appellant appeared before them and caught hold
of the hands of Lalita Kumari. The deceased
protested. The appellant took out a dragger from his waist and inflicted stab
injuries on various part of her body including
her neck. The deceased fell down crying,
but the appellant continued to attack her
and inflicted 8 or 10 injuries on her persons. On seeing dastardly attack on the
deceased, P.W. 1 ran towards the village.
On reaching the village, she informed P.W.
4 Beni Sahu, father of the deceased, P.W.8,
Gita Devi, mother of the deceased and P.W.
2, Ramdhani Sahu, a villager, P.W. 3,
Tarkeshwar Sahu and then P.W. 7, Ram
Sewak Sahu. She narrated the whole incident to them. They went to the place and
thereafter P.W. 1 gave the fardbeyan, Ext.
2, at the police station at 5.30 p.m. This
was registered as a crime and investigation
was taken up by P.W. 5, Niranjan Mandal.
He conducted inquest over the dead body
of Lalita Kumari by preparing inquest report, Ext. 3. The Police Officer,
after conducting inquest, sent the dead body to the
hospital for post mortem, on receipt of
which, P.W. 12, Dr. Arun Kumar, conducted
autopsy on the dead body and found the
following injuries:-
"STAB WOUNDS:--
(i) 3 x 1 x 4 cm on left lateral neck upper
part;
(ii) 3 x1 x 3 cm on left lateral neck middle
part,
(iii) 1 x 1/2 x 1 1/2 cm left cheek
(iv) 1 x 1/2 x 1 1/2 cm left chest front upper
part
(v) Perforating wound:-
(a) wound of entrance 03 x 1 cm on left
lateral arm middle part. The weapon passed
through soft tissues made an exit would 1
x 1/2 cm on left arm medial side upper part;
(b) wound of entrance 3 x 1 cm on left
wrist back. The weapon passed through soft
tissues and made an exit wound 2 x 1 cm
on left wrist midial side, (vi) 2 x 1 cm x cavity deep on left chest back. The weapon
passed through soft tissues and entered
into left lung.
(vii) 2 1/2 x cavity deep on right chest
back. The weapon passed through soft tissues and entered into right lung &
(viii) 2 x 1 cm x cavity deep, 3 x 1 cm x
cavity deep, 2 1/2 x 1 cm x cavity deep, 2 x 1
cm x cavity deep on back of trunk lower
part. The weapon passed through abdominal wall and entered into small intestine
and mesentery. There was presence of blood
and blood clot in thoraco abdominal cavity"
The Doctor issued Ext. 5, the post
mortem certificate, with his opinion that
death is on account of shock and hemorrhage due to the injuries and that the said
injuries would have been caused by a sharp
cutting weapon and possibly by knife.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.