JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Both the appellants on
being tried, have been found and held guilty
for the offence under Section 302/34 of the
Indian Penal Code by common judgment
dated 30.8.2000 passed by the Sessions
Judge, Palamau in Sessions Trial No. 142
of 1999 and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for life each and to pay a fine
of Rs. 2,000 each, in default thereof to further undergo simple
imprisonment for six months. As both the appeals arise out of the
same judgment, they have been heard together and are being disposed
of by this common judgment.
(2.) Brief facts leading to their conviction
are that in the afternoon of 14.3.1998, informant Kayum Sah of
village Naya Bazar was
passing through Bazar and the appellants
wanted to put colour on him to which he
protested then appellant Mahendra Thakur
asked appellant Radhey Sham Prasad to
pour petrol on him. Further stated that appellant Radhey Shyam
Prasad brought
petrol kept in a container from his shop and
threw it on his back, after which appellant
Mahendra Thakur set him on fire with a
match. The informant receiving burn injuries raised alarms and fell down.
Many persons after which arrived at and got the fire
extinguished. The informant received burn
injuries on his chest, back, face and arms
etc. He was shifted to Sadar Hospital,
Daltonganj for treatment, where his
fardbeyan was recorded by one A.S.I.
Rameshwar Singh of Town Police Station
at about 8.00 p.m. in presence of Minhaj
Sah, the son of the informant.
(3.) This fardbeyan was forwarded to O.C.
Bishrampur Police Station, on the basis of
which Bishrampur Police Station Case No.
24 of 1998 dated 15.3.1998 was registered
under Sections 341/324/307/34 of the Indian
Penal Code. In spite of treatment, informant
Kayum Sah succumbed to these burns injuries on 22.4.1998.
Accordingly, charge-sheet was submitted under Section 302/341/34
of the Indian Penal Code against both
the appellants. Their cases were committed
to the Court of Sessions for trial. The
learned trial Court, Sessions Judge,
Palamau framed charge against both the
appellants under Sections 341 and 302/34
of the Indian Penal Code. The defence
pleaded not guilty and claimed innocence.
However, after examining the witnesses,
the learned trial Court found and held both
of them guilty under Section 302/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and sentenced them as
stated above.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.