JUDGEMENT
N.N.TIWARI, J. -
(1.) HEARD .
(2.) THIS second appeal has been preferred by the defendants/appellants/ respondents.
The plaintiffs/appellants/respondents filed a suit in the Court below for declaration of their right, title and interest in respect of the suit lands, described in Scheduled B of the plaint. The plaintiffs
also prayed for recovery of possession and for injunction restraining the respondent not to raise
any construction or structure over the suit land. The suit land measuring 3/4 decimals, appertains to
Khata No. 566, Plot No. 53351/7833 of Maufa Chas, District Bokaro. The plaintiffs case is that an
area of 3 decimals of the said plot was purchased by one Ram Jagnania from Nagarmal Jagnania
with specific boundary. Originally the said land measuring an area of 31 decimals was settled to
one Anu Gope. He having been in peaceful possession, had sold that entire land to one Washi
Jagnania and Banbari Lal Jagnania by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 29.9.1966. The said
purchasers came in possession of the said land and subsequently transferred an area of 3 decimal
to Nagarmal Jagnania by registered sale deed dated 14.6.1968. The said purchasers constructed
a Gumti (Shed) over the same. In the year, 1976, the defendants were allowed to raise a
temporary shed of bamboo shoots over a portion of the land. Taking undue advantage of the
same, he claimed himself as a privilege tenant and applied for a parcha under the provisions of
Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act and a parcha was allegedly granted in his
favour. The said order for granting parcha was challenged in a writ petition being CWJC No. 871 of
1979 by the plaintiffs and the order was quashed" and the said parcha was cancelled.
(3.) THE defendants claimed acquisition of right and title over the suit land by adverse possession. However, there was no proper pleading to constitute a case of adverse possession.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.