SAMSUDDIN MIAN AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2015-1-156
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on January 30,2015

Samsuddin Mian And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Virender Singh, J. - (1.) I.A. No. 3298 of 2014.
(2.) APPLICANT -appellant -Samsuddin Mian is stated to be of the age of 75/76 years. When his bail application was lastly considered by this Court and rejected, the office was directed to list the appeal for final hearing in the first week of December, 2013 making it further clear that if the appeal is not heard till June, 2014, the applicant -appellant shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Hence, the instant application. It would be apt to reproduce the order dated 31.10.2013. It reads: - "In this I.A., the appellant No. 1 -Samsuddin Mian has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though his same prayer was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than 5 years; the appellant is above 75 years and there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future. Learned APP opposed the appellant's prayer and submitted that his prayer for bail was earlier considered and rejected twice on merit and no fresh ground has been made out for reconsideration of the prayer. Regard being had to the fact that the appellant's prayer was earlier rejected on considering the materials on record on merit and no fresh ground has been made out, we are not inclined to release the appellant No. 1 on bail. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. However, since the appellant No. 1 is a senior citizen, this appeal deserves to be heard at an early date. Office is directed to list this case under the heading "For Hearing" in first week of December, 2013. If the appeal is not heard till 30th June, 2014, the appellant No. 1 shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. I.A. No. 7921 of 2013 is disposed of." Learned counsel submits that there is no likelihood of the instant appeal being heard in near future for the reason that the Court is hearing other appeals starting from year 2002 considering the custody period. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant -appellant is suffering from many ailments.
(3.) LEARNED State counsel, after getting me latest health condition report of the applicant -appellant from the concerned Medical Officer of the jail, states that the applicant -appellant, who undoubtedly is getting the required treatment, is having some cardiac problem for which he has been referred for Angiography. He also remained hospitalized from 17.05.2014 to 12.06.2014.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.