LAKHAN KUMAR Vs. CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LTD
LAWS(JHAR)-2005-5-23
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on May 05,2005

Lakhan Kumar Appellant
VERSUS
Central Coal Fields Ltd Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) JUDGEMENT 1. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, we are satisfied that sufficient ground has been made out for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly the delay is condoned and the appeal is taken up for consideration today itself.
(2.) THE father of the appellant writ petitioner is said to have been appointed as security guard under the Central Coalfields Limited in the year 1984. He died in harness on 23rd November, 1997 and it may be relevant to indicate that his mother, Bachni Devi, died prior to his father on 17th August, 1997. A death certificate in that behalf has been annexed as Annexure -3 to the memorandum of appeal. As will appear from the materials available on the record the appellant writ petitioner applied to the respondent company for appointment on compassionate ground in December 1999 and he was also asked to appear at an interview on 17th April, 2001 pursuant to the said application. It is the case of the writ petitioner appellant that after lapse of one year, by a letter dated 13th March, 2002 he was asked to produce the service record of his father. Since nothing further was done in the matter, the appellant writ petitioner filed a fresh representation on 6th April, 2004 but even then it had no effect and accordingly, he was compelled to file a writ application, WP (S) 2352 of 2004, which was disposed of with the direction upon the respondents to consider and dispose of the appellant's application for appointment on compassionate ground within a period of three months from 30th April, 2004. Subsequently, the Personnel Manager of the respondent company informed the appellant writ petitioner by his letter dated 10th August, 2004 that his application for appointment had been rejected on the ground that it had been made at a belated stage i.e. four years after the death of his father. According to the respondents the said belated application was contrary to the scheme, which provided that a dependent of the deceased, who applies within six months from the date of death of the deceased, would be considered for appointment on compassionate ground. The said decision of the respondent was challenged by the appellant writ petitioner in WP (S) 5291 of 2004 which was dismissed on 30th September, 2004, purportedly on the ratio of the decision of a Bench of this Court in WP (S) 6589 of 2002.
(3.) AGGRIEVED by the order of the learned Single Judge, the appellant writ petitioner preferred the instant appeal and it has been mainly contended by Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, appearing in support of the appeal that the provisions of the National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) -VI which became effective from 1st July, 1996 was operative at the relevant time when the father of the appellant died. In the facts and circumstances of the instant case, the learned Single Judge, however, dismissed the writ petition. Mr. Singh very strongly urged that the case of the writ petitioner appellant was different from that of the decision in WP (S) 6589 of 2002, since at the time of the death of his father he was minor and paragraph 9.5.0 of the NCWA VI would have application in his case whereas in the said decision what fell for consideration was the general provision under paragraph 9.3.2 of the NCWAs. IV and V.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.