JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
(2.) Both these applications are for grant
of anticipatory bail to the petitioner filed
under Section 438, Cr. P.C. in Vigilance P.S.
Case No. 18/2002 dated 8-3-2002 giving rise
to Special Case No. 19/2002 and Vigilance
P.S. Case No. 19/2002 being Special Case
No. 20/2002 under Sections 420, 467, 468,
471, 409, 201, 109, 120-B, IPC read with
Sections 13(2), 12(i)(d) of the P.C. Act, 1988.
Vigilance P.S. Case No. 18/2002 was registered for the purchase
made from 1999 to
8-3-2000, whereas Vigilance P.S. Case No.
19/2002 was registered for the purchase
made from 1995 to 2000.
(3.) Facts leading to the filing of the applications are that on
8-3-2002 on the written
information of DSP Vigilance, Jharkhand,
Ranchi, stating therein that on the orders
of Additional Secretary and Director General,
Vigilance, he held preliminary enquiry
into the allegations of illegal payments, construction work
carried out and in the matter of purchase of materials and the
Principal, Registrar and others of Regional Institute of
Technology, Jamshedpur are involved. It is stated that allegations
had been
made that furniture worth of Rs. 80.00 lacs
has been purchased by the aforesaid persons against financial
rules and on enquiry
it was found that Human Resources and
Development Authority had allotted Rs.
76.27 lacs to the institute in the year 1998-99 for purchase of
furniture and on 1-4-99
Warden A. K. Singh had written a letter to
the Principal that furniture such as 150
study chairs, 150 common room chairs, 4
common room tables, 4 magazine tables, 4
class tables, 12 dining tables, 25 dining
chairs, 80 wooden cots and 20 study tables
were required in the newly constructed hostel No. H. S. N. Sinha,
who was then Principal, invited tenders from manufacturers/
dealers and thereafter two firms M/s. Om
Enterprises, Jamshedpur and M/s. S. D.
Sales Corporation, Jamshedpur were ordered to supply furniture
to the institute and
on 24-4-99 the above firms have been approved by the Purchase
Committee and both
the firms were paid some amounts by way
of advance. At the time of advance, Mr. N.
K. Agrawal was the Acting Registrar of the
Institute and thereafter Syed Ajmat Hussain
jined as Registrar on 15-6-99. Syed Ajmat
Hussain after joining on the post of Registrar started creating
hurdles in payment of
advances to the aforesaid firms. It is alleged
that he started putting hurdles for personal
gain but any how he issued cheques to the
firms at the instance of Principal. Thereafter petitioner R. Yadav
joined as Principal of
the Institute on 15-7-99 and the said Registrar Syed Ajmat Hussain
and Store Keeper
S, K. Bhagat came in collusion with the new
Principal, cancelled the supply order earlier
given to the firms on the ground that the
furniture supplied were substandard and
were not up to the mark and petitioner thereafter placed orders for
supply to the local
dealers in the open market. Principal ordered for supply of 150
armless chairs, 150
stools, 140 arm chairs, all worth Rs.
l;24,820.85 paise and this amount was paid
to M/s. Basant Agency, Jamshedpur and
M/s. Lakshmi Furnitures and it is alleged
that payment was made in connivance with
DJ. B. K. Prasad.'Sri A. K. Singh, Sri S. A.
Hussain and S. K. Bhagat. It is also alleged
that even after supply, there was an allotment of 75.00 lacs,
which remained available with the institute and due to this heavy
amount remained available with the institute, the Principal and
Registrar started
reckless purchase of furniture even though
they were not required to purchase the same
without any sanction by the Purchase Committee. It is also
alleged that Purchase Committee was a pocketing Committee of the
Principal and Registrar and after purchases
made by them the Purchase Committee used
to confirm the order. On 17-2-99 a sum of
Rs. 49,01,841/- was paid to the Patna firm
and this fact was pointed out by A.G. in audit
report that except Wood and Craft Patna,
all other firms supplied furnitures, which
were found of substandard. The specification of wood was also
found to be changed
and the computer tables and chairs were
distributed in every Department and except
computer center, no other firms had any
computer and on enquiry DSP found 143
computers in the computer centres, which
were in use but few tables and chairs were
kept there. So much quantity of furniture:
was not required and, therefore, they were
kept here and there. 1400 plastic chairs and
1000 plastic stools were also purchased,
which were found kept in the store room.;