JUDGEMENT
M.Y.EQBAL, J. -
(1.) HEARD Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
(2.) THIS revision application is directed against the order dated 21 -4 -2004 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Giridih in Cr. Appeal No. 19 of 2004 whereby he has rejected the prayer for bail of
the petitioner, and further prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, learned counsel, submitted that the petitioner has been declared juvenile and, therefore, in view of the provision of Sec.2 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of
Children) Act, 2000, he is entitled to be released on bail.
(3.) ON the basis of FIR lodged against the petitioner, after due investigation, charge -sheet was submitted against the petitioner for committing offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323
and 341, Indian Penal Code and accordingly cognizance of the offences has been taken by the
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions. It further
appears from the record that earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected upto this Hon ble
Court in B.A. No. 1349 of 2003 when the case was at an early stage of investigation. Thereafter,
on the application, the petitioner was declared juvenile by the Juvenile Court vide order dated 11 -
3 -2004. The prayer for bail of the petitioner, thereafter, was rejected by the Juvenile Court and in the appeal filed by the petitioner, the prayer for bail was rejected holding that there is direct
allegation of committing murder against the appellant who had gone in association of anti -social
elements.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.