JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present arbitration
application has been filed for appointment
of arbitrator in accordance with provisions
of Section 11(6)(c) of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
(2.) The petitioner was allotted work of
transportation of surplus earth from
Bhojudih Coal Washery. The work was
allotted by work order dated 7-3-2000
pursuant to the notice dated 20-8-1999. The
work was to be completed within the
stipulated time. The petitioner's case is that
after completion of the job, several letters
were sent but the bills were not finalized.
Ultimately dispute arose between the
parties. The petitioner, therefore, invoked
clause 9 of the Agreement which is a
arbitration clause and gave notice for
reference of the dispute for arbitration.
(3.) The respondents filed counter-affidavit
wherein it is stated that the petitioner has
already moved the Subordinate Judge-I,
Dhanbad by filing application under Section
9 of the said Act which was registered as
Misc. (Arbitration) Case No. 45 of 2003. This
fact has not been disclosed in the arbitration
application. It is, therefore, contended that
the petitioner cannot be allowed to avail two
parallel remedies.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.