GADADHAR ROY Vs. CHHEDI RAM PARSURMKA
LAWS(JHAR)-2005-8-19
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 25,2005

Gadadhar Roy Appellant
VERSUS
Chhedi Ram Parsurmka Respondents

JUDGEMENT

M.Y.EQBAL, J. - (1.) HEARD the parties.
(2.) THE revision application under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 has been filed by the petitionertenant challenging the order dated 10-5-2005 passed by the Subordinate Judge-I, Godda in Title Eviction Suit No. 2 of 2001, whereby he has directed the petitioner- tenant to vacate the premises within 30 days from the date of the order. Plaintiff-respondent filed the aforementioned suit for eviction of the defendant-petitioner on the ground of bona fide personal necessity. Even after service of summons, the petitioner did not make out a case for obtaining leave to contest the suit. Consequently the suit was decreed under Section 14(4) of the said Act by dated 24-2-2003. The petitioner challenged the said order by filing Civil Revision No. 292 of 2003. This Court in terms of order dated 20-8-2003 allowed the revision application and set aside the order dated 24-2-2003. The matter was remitted back to the Court below to consider the averments made in the plaint seeking eviction and on being satisfied prima facie, a fresh order of eviction may be passed under Section 14(4) of the Act. The learned Court below on remand considered the case of the plaintiff-respondent and after recording satisfaction; the impugned order of eviction was passed which is under challenge.
(3.) SECTION 14 of the Act laid down the provision of law for disposal of the case of eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement. Sub-section (1) of Section 14 provides that a suit for eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement shall be dealt with in accordance with procedures specified in the Section. Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 14 laid down the manner in which summons shall be served upon the defendant. Sub-section (4) of Section 14 provides that if the defendant-tenant after service of summons fails to make out a case by filing an affidavit, the Court shall not grant lave to contest the suit. For better appreciation, sub-sections (4), (5) and (6) of Section 14 are reproduced hereinbelow :- "(4) The tenant on whom summons is duly served (whether by ordinary mail or by registered post) shall not contest the prayer for eviction from the premises unless he files an affidavit stating the ground on which he seeks to make such contest and obtains leave from the Court as hereinafter provided and in default of the appearances in pursuance of the summons or he obtains such leave the statement made by the landlord in the suit for eviction shall be deemed to be admitted by the tenant and the landlord shall be entitled to an order for eviction on the ground aforesaid." (5) The Court shall give to the tenant leave to contest the suit if the affidavit filed by the tenant discloses facts as would disentitle the landlord from obtaining an order of eviction on the grounds specified in clauses (c) and (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 11. (6) When leave is granted to the tenant to contest the suit, the latter may, within 15 days from the date of the order, pray after filing the requisite Court-fee, required for a written statement that the affidavit may be treated as the written statement, or if he chooses to file a separate written statement he may do so within 15 days of the grant of leave to contest the suit and if he does not file the written statement within the period he shall not be allowed to do so later. The Court shall thereafter commence the hearing of the suit as early as practicable. ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.