JUDGEMENT
P.P.BHATT -
(1.) 5/ 02.05.2014 Present application has been filed under sections 438 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
seeking anticipatory bail as the petitioner has a
reasonable apprehension of his arrest in connection
with P.C.R. Case No. 219 of 2007 registered for the
offence punishable under section 364 of the Indian Penal
Code now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate,Pakur.
(2.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned APP appearing on behalf of
the State. Perused the FIR and other papers attached to
this petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely
implicated in the alleged crime merely on suspicion. It is
further submitted that from bare reading of the complaint
case prima facie it appears that ingredient of the alleged
offence is not attracted against the present petitioner. It
is further submitted that infact, petitioner filed an FIR on
21.2.2006 against the driver and cleaner of the truck registered for the offence punishable under sections
406/419/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, as the truck in question of the petitioner was missing after entrustment
to the driver and cleaner. It is further submitted that
complaint case has been instituted subsequent to filing
of the F.I.R. by the present petitioner without any basis
and merely on suspicion. It is lastly submitted that the
(3.) PETITIONER is a law abiding citizen and having no criminal antecedent and is ready and willing to cooperate with
investigation of the case and shall abide the terms and
conditions that may be imposed by this court and
therefore, the petitioner may be granted anticipatory
bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.