JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant.
Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 3rd February, 2014 passed by the
(2.) LEARNED Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Cr. Appeal No.15 of 2014, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 20.1.2014 passed by the Juvenile Justice
Board, Ranchi, in G.R. No. 7086 of 2013, arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case
No.1166 of 2013, rejecting the bail application of the juvenile petitioner, has been
dismissed by the Appellate Court below.
Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.1166 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 7086 of 2013, for the offence under
Sections 120 -B, 364 and 302 IPC. The case was instituted on the basis of the
written application given by the father of the deceased girl, stating that his minor
daughter was missing from home and he learnt that she was taken away by the
co -accused Priyanshu Ranjan and the petitioner Shubham Pandey.
Subsequently, the dead body of the deceased was recovered from a pond and
Section 302 IPC was also added.
(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and during investigation, it was found that both the accused
persons were the friends of the deceased. It has been pointed out from the case
diary that the confessional statement of the co -accused Priyanshu Ranjan was
recorded, from which it transpires that prior to the occurrence, the deceased was
with him. In the meantime, petitioner had also made a call to the deceased, on
which there was some hot exchange of words between the petitioner and the
co -accused. It also appears from the said confessional statement that thereafter,
the deceased wanted to commit suicide, but the co -accused, who was with the
deceased tried to prevent her from committing suicide and thereafter, both of them
went away. Subsequently, the dead body of the deceased was found. One
witness, who is a shopkeeper near the pond, from where the dead body of the
deceased was recovered, has also stated that the deceased and the co -accused
Priyanshu Ranjan were engaged in hot exchange of words and the boy informed
him that the deceased was trying to commit suicide, whereupon he scolded both
of them and both of them went away. Subsequently, the dead
body of the deceased was found. Learned counsel for the petitioner
accordingly, submitted that even the presence of the petitioner was not found near the place of
occurrence. Learned counsel further submitted that after investigation the charge -
sheet has been submitted under Section 306 IPC and accordingly, prayed for bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.