SATWANTI AUTOMOBILES Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA
LAWS(JHAR)-2014-9-23
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on September 17,2014

Satwanti Automobiles Appellant
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Aggrieved by order dated 16.07.2014 in S.A. No. 81 of 2014 passed by the Presiding Officer, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi and seeking quashing of Eauction notice dated 12.06.2014, the petitioners have filed this writ petition. Further prayers seeking direction upon the respondentBank to disclose the name of the bidders and the consideration amount for which the property in question was sold, have also been made.
(2.) The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner no. 1 is the proprietor of the firm namely M/s Satwanti Automobiles and the petitioner no. 2 is the guarantor for loan advanced in favour of M/s Satwanti Automobiles. For the loan granted by the respondentState Bank of India vide loan a/c nos. 11400640036 and 11400675842, the petitioner no. 2 stood as guarantor and the original Title Deed of 3 immovable properties were pledged as mortgage to the respondentBank. The loan account of the petitioners was declared Non Performing Assets (NPA) and subsequently, the respondentBank invoked the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and issued notice under Section 13(2) to the petitioners. A notice under Section 13(4) was also issued on 28.06.2010. Challenging the notice dated 28.06.2010 under Section 13(4), the petitioners filed S.A. No. 81 of 2014 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi. An application in the pending SARFAESI Appeal was filed seeking stay of auction notice dated 13.06.2014. By order dated 16.07.2014, the petitioners were afforded opportunity to deposit 8 lacs on 17.07.2014 by 12.00 noon. The learned Presiding Officer, D.R.T. directed the Bank not to resort to sale on 16.07.2014 however, it was made clear that in the event the amount of Rs. 8.00 lacs is not paid, the Bank shall proceed with Eauction according to law on 17.07.2014 or 18.07.2014, without giving any further notice to the borrower.
(3.) A counteraffidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondentBank raising a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition. It is stated that the petitioners have already preferred S.A. No. 81 of 2014 under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and against the impugned order dated 16.07.2014 the petitioners have a remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. It is stated that notice dated 10.09.2012 was served upon the petitioners and the same was published in two daily newspapers namely "Dainik Hindustan" (Hindi) and "Hindustan Times" (English). The matter was taken to Bank Lok Adalat on 06.11.2012 and the petitioners undertook to pay the entire outstanding loan amount by 28.02.2013 however, the petitioners failed to honour the undertaking given before the Bank Lok Adalat. The date for auction was fixed on 16.07.2014, after giving 30 days' clear notice to the petitioners.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.