NAWAL KISHORE TIWARI Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
LAWS(JHAR)-2004-5-43
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on May 17,2004

Nawal Kishore Tiwari Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD counsel for the Writ Petitioner and learned Government counsel.
(2.) THE petitioner filed this writ petition on 3.2.1992 seeking to challenge the order dated 8.10.1987 rejecting his claim to appointment in a Taken Over Government School, rejected on the basis of the ratio of the decision of the Full Bench of the Patna High Court in Ram Naresh Prasad Nibas V/s. State of Bihar, 1987 PLJR 341. According to the writ petitioner, he was appointed as an untrained teacher in the Kalyan High School, Chuliha in the district of Deoghar on 25.1.1979. No doubt, the respondents have a case that the private school itself was started only in the year 1980. It is seen that the permission for establishment of the private school was given only in the year 1980. Whatever it be, when the Government took over this school on 5.7.1983, the petitioner was, even, according to his own case, an untrained teacher. Therefore, the concerned Committee found that he was not liable to be absorbed in the Government School. A report was prepared recommending the names of five trained teachers for absorption and it was accepted.
(3.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, at the time the School was taken over, he had been selected for undergoing teachers ' training and he had joined the course for the session 1983 -85 and had obtained B.Ed. Degree in December, 1986. According to him, going by a Circular issued by the Government of Bihar on 21.12.1982, he must also be considered eligible for absorption in the Government School. At the time of take over, he was undergoing training. It seems that some representation had been made in this regard before the concerned authority. He also approached the Patna High Court in CWJC No. 5609/1983. A Division Bench of the Patna High Court taking into consideration the pendency of the representation before the authority, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and observed that it is expected that the representation would be disposed of at an early date. Thereafter, after hearing the writ petitioner, the representation was rejected by order dated 8.10.1987 marked as Annexure - 1 in the Writ petition.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.