JUDGEMENT
M.Y.EQBAL, J. -
(1.) THE petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondents to make appointment on the post of Assistants in the Vidhan Sabha Secretariat strictly as per the provisions of Jharkhand Vidhan
Sabha Secretariat (Recruitment and Condition of Services) Rules, 2003 and on the basis of the
advertisement issued by respondent No. 2 and published in the Newspaper dated 20.12.2003 and
further for quashing the advertisement issued by Incharge Secretary of the Jharkhand Vidhan
Sabha, Ranchi on 29.12.2002 not to make appointment on the basis of said advertisement.
(2.) PETITIONER 'scase is that the Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha (Recruitment and Condition of Services) Rules, 2003 (in short the 'Rules ') has been published in Jharkhand Gazette
on 10.3.2003 making provision for constitution of appointment committee for the purpose of
recruitment of staff in Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha Secretariat. On 20.12.2003 advertisement for
appointment has been issued by the Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha for appointment on the post of
Assistant. The last date for submission of applications for the post of Assistant was 3.1.2004. It is
alleged that although appointment have to be made as per statutory Rules but respondent Nos. 3
and 4 illegally started taking steps for back door appointment of 52 candidates who have been
called for the written test and for which written examination was held on 17.1.2004. It is contended
that all those 52 persons who have been called for written test were earlier appointed illegally by
the then Speaker, Bihar Vidhan Sabha. The said appointment was challenged before the Patna
High Court in CWJC No. 7995/ 1990 and all the appointments of Assistant numbering about 285
persons was declared illegal and quashed. The said judgment of Single Judge of the Patna High
Court was challenged in Letter Patent Appeal which was also dismissed. The appeal filed before
the Supreme Court was also dismissed and thereafter Bihar Vidhan Sabha Secretariat issued order
dated 10.12.1996 terminating the services of all those employees. Allegation has been made that
52 dismissed/terminated employees of Bihar Vidhan Sabha have been issued back door admit cards by the Speaker of the Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha for appearance in the written test.
A counter affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 namely. Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand and the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms
and Raj Bhasa. Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi in which it is stated that the matter of
appointment relates to Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha and therefore these respondents need not
required to be replied. However, it is stated that Government of Jharkhand has issued its
reservation policy prescribing 50% reservation for the reserve category.
(3.) THE contesting respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have filed counter affidavit stating inter alia that first advertisement dated 29.12.2002 was issued considering the facts that Assembly was facing
difficulties in its functioning on account of shortage of staff having only 7 Assistants. The aforesaid
advertisement laid down different conditions, one of the essential conditions in the advertisement
being three year 'sexperience in any Legislative Establishment. Subsequently, post in the
Jharkhand Legislative Assembly were notified and in pursuance of which second advertisement
was brought out after lapse of about one year in which apart from the post of Assistant, post of
drivers and grade IV posts were also advertised. So far second advertisement is concerned, over
a lac of applications have been received which are yet to be processed. It is contended that first
advertisement was made in the interest of administration and day -to -day running of the Jharkhand
Legislative Assembly. Respondents further case is that in view of the observation made in LPA
No. 20/1995 and having regard to the immediate need of staff in the Assembly, first advertisement
was issued.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.