JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal at the instance of the appellants stands directed
against the impugned judgment and order
dated 12-4-1996 and 17-4-1996 respectively
passed in S.T. No. 346 of 1994, Trial No.
119 of 1994 by Smt. Shakuntala Sinha,
Additional Judicial Commissioner, Khunti
(Ranchi) whereby and whereunder they were
found guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal
Code and they were convicted and sentenced
to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.
(2.) The prosecution case has arisen on the
basis of the written report (Ext. 2) of PW-3
Budhram Singh Munda, the informant,
lodged before the Officer Incharge, Tamar
Police Station on 17-11-1993 at 20.00 hours
regarding the occurrence which is said to
have taken place on that very day at 13.00
hours at Lawaikir, Police Station Tamar Sub-
Division Khunti District Ranchi. Bansidhar
Munda is the deceased in this case and he
was engaged by the informant for cutting
wood on the alleged day of the occurrence.
A case was instituted by drawing of a formal FIR (Ext. 4) against the appellants on
that very day at 20.00 hours. The written
report and the formal FIR have been received
on 22-11-1993 in the Court empowered to
take cognizance.
(3.) The prosecution case, in brief, is that
the informant went to the house of PW-5
Budhanlal Singh Munda at about 10.00
hours on 17-11-1993 with his bullock cart
along with his labourers namely, Mahar
Singh Munda resident of village Murgidih
and Bansidhar Singh Munda (deceased in
this case) resident of village Burukandey and
the informant asked PW-5 Bhudhanlal
Singh Munda to show the tree. It is alleged
that PW-5 Bhudhanlal Singh Munda came
to Lawaikir with the informant and his two
labourers aforesaid to show the tree which
was to be cut. It is alleged that the informant along with his two labourers cut the
branches of the said Asan tree and loaded
the wood on the bullock cart aforesaid. The
prosecution case further is that all the appellants aforesaid along with co-accused
Dolgovind Singh, Arjun Singh and Dubai
Singh, all residents of village Barukandey
came there variously armed with Lathi and
Farsa and they asked the informant to stop
the bullock cart and on query they told that
they have some work with Bansidhar Singh
Munda and they further asked the informant
to proceed ahead with the bullock cart and
at this the informant again asked as to what
sort of work they have with Bansidhar
Munda and at this co-accused Dolgovind
Singh Munda uttered that Bansidhar Munda
is to be done to death. It is alleged that that
informant requested them to allow
Bansidhar Singh Munda to go with him as
he has employed him for the day for wood
cutting but his request went in vain. The
prosecution case further is that co-accused
Dolgovind Singh Munda directed appellant
Sambat Singh Munda to commit the murder of Bansidhar Singh Munda and at this
appellant Sambat Singh Munda gave a blow
on the neck of Bansidhar Singh Munda by
Farsa as a result of which an injury was
caused on his neck and thereafter the remaining appellants and other co-accused
persons started assaulting him by Lathi and
Farsa. It is alleged that the informant along
with PW-5 Budhanlal Singh Munda and his
labourers Mahar Singh Munda proceeded to
their respective villages with the bullock cart
and the informant narrated the incident to
the residents of his village Barudih besides
PW-6 Haldhar Hazam, the Chowkidar, going to his village Kurkutta and thereafter the
informant along with the Chowkidar and
some co-villagers came to the place of occurrence at Lawaikir and from there he went
to the police station directing his co-villagers and the Chowkidar aforesaid to keep vigil
on the dead body.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.