JUDGEMENT
AMARESHWAR SAHAY, J. -
(1.) HEARD the parties.
(2.) THE respondent No. 5 Singha Oraon, filed an application for restoration of Plot No. 1061 under khata No. 177 of Village Karkarra under Sec. 71 -A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act alleging
therein that the transfer of the land was made in contravention of the provision of Chotanagpur
Tenancy Act. The respondent No. 4, Special Regulation Officer, vide order as contained in
Annexure -5, passed an order for restoration of the land in favour of respondent No. 5. Against the
said order passed by respondent No. 4 the writ petitioner preferred an appeal before the Additional
Collector, Ranchi, which was dismissed vide order as contained in Annexure -6. Thereafter, the
petitioner -preferred revision under Section 217 of Chotanagpur Tenancy Act before the
Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi, which was also dismissed vide order as
contained in Annexure 7. The petitioner has challenged the aforesaid three orders passed by the
Special Regulation Officer, the Additional Collector and of the Commissioner.
The case of the petitioner in short is that in the Revisional Survey Records of Right, khata No. 177 of Village Karkarra P.S. Mandar was recorded in the name of Singha Oraon as Adhbatai and in the remarks column it was mentioned that the land was mortgaged for Rs. 1500.00 in 1921 and
the same would be redeemed on payment of the mortgage amount. The ex -landlord mortgaged
the R.S. Plot No. 1061 measuring an area of 1.41 acres to Prahalad Nand Tiwary in the year 1921
for Rs. 1500.00 which was redeemed on payment of the mortgage money. The ex -landlord
redeemed the mortgage in the year 1936 and came in possession thereof.
(3.) IT is stated that an application was filed by the recorded Adhbataidar under Section 61 of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, for commutation of the kind rent. The Rent Suit Deputy Collector by
order dated 25.4.1957 held that respondent No. 5 failed to prove his possession over the disputed
land and thereby rejected the said application. It is further stated that after vesting of the
Zamindari, the ex -landlord filed return including the land of khata No. 177 of the said Village and
he was recognized as raiyat of the State. Thereafter, the ex -landlord Sadanand Tiwary sold and
transferred the land of khata No. 177, Plot No. 1061 measuring an area of 1.41 acres to the
petitioner by virtue of registered document on 26.7.1967. It is stated that after the purchase of the
land the petitioner applied for mutation of her name, which was allowed after making enquiry. It is
further stated that in the recent survey also the draft record of right was prepared in the name of
the petitioner without any objection.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.