JUDGEMENT
AMARESHWAR SAHAY, J. -
(1.) THE petitioner had challenged the order as contained in letter No. 1208 (Eastt) dated 30.12.1996, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau addressed to District Welfare Officer, Palamau, whereby the District Welfare Officer was directed to relieve the petitioner to join the
Residential High School, Garu as he was an employee of the said school. It was further directed
that the show cause notice also be issued asking explanation from the petitioner regarding serious
financial irregularities and also to make necessary correction in his service book in consultation with
the District Accounts Officer to ascertain the amount which was paid in excess to the petitioner and
action be taken against this petitioner for realization of the amount paid in excess to him. The
aforesaid letter had been annexed as Annexure -5 to the present writ application.
(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as a clerk in the Welfare cadre in the Department of Welfare at Garu Residential High School in the district of Palamau. The appointment
letter has not been annexed with the present writ application by the petitioner. It is stated on
behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner joined in the office of District Welfare Department,
Palamau on 28.2.1984 and thereafter on 13.3.1984 he was relieved by the District Welfare Officer
to join Garu Residential High School where he joined on 5.3.1984. It is further stated that he
passed Hindi noting and drafting examination on 15 -4.1984 and the Final Accounts Examination
on 10.9.1993.
Subsequently on 19.8.1992 by order of Dy. Director (Welfare) South Chot -tanagpur, Division Ranchi i.e. Respondent No. 2 the petitioner was relieved from Garu Residential High School to join
in the office of District Welfare Officer, Gumla. However, on representation made by the petitioner
he was transferred and posted in the office of District Welfare Officer, Palamau as per the order as
contained in Annexure -1 to the present writ application. Thereafter, by order dated 19.5.1994 as
contained in Annexure -2 the petitioner is said to have been granted Junior Selection Grade with
effect from 1.4.1993 in the pay scale of Rs. 1400 -2300 and then by issuance of Annexure -3 under
the signature of Dy. Director (Welfare) South Chotanagpur Division, i.e. Respondent No. 2, the
order dated 19.5.1994 (Annexure -2) the date of promotion of the petitioner in the pay scale of
Junior Selection Grade with effect from 1.4.1993 was modified by correcting the said date to be
effective from 1.4.1992 and he was further granted Senior Selection Grade with effect from
1.4.1995 in the pay scale of Rs. 1400 -2600. The said order has been annexed as Annexure -3 to the present writ application.
(3.) IT appears that by issuance of An -nexure -5 dated 31.12.1996 the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau after considering the fact.
(i) that the petitioner was Initially appointed in the pay scale of Rs. 425 -605 to the post of Assistant in the Residential School Garu on 28.3.1984.
(ii) that as per the service book the petitioner was wrongly granted in the pay scale of Rs. 580 -860 to the post of accountant -cum -clerk and thereafter his pay fixed In the revised scale of Rs. 1200 -1800 on 1.1.1986 was illegal.
(iii) that petitioner was wrongly given Senior Selection Grade in the scale of Rs. 1400 - 2600 against the Government order and. circular.
(iv) that according to the Government rules, there should be a gap in between first promotion and second promotion.
(v) that the petitioner was wrongly given Senior Selection grade only within a period of three years whereas he was entitled to first promotion with effect from 10.10.1993 and thereafter he may have been entitled to the second promotion after completion of five years with effect from 10.10.1998 and it appears that serious financial Irregularities have been committed in giving promotion to the petitioner and fixing his pay scale and therefore, direction was made to the District Welfare Officer, Palamu.
(A) To relieve the petitioner who joined at the Residential High School, Garu as he was an employee of the said very school.
(B) Notice to the show cause be issued to the petitioner asking for explanation for serious financial irregularities.
(C) In consultation with the District Accounts Officer the fixation of Pay of the petitioner be corrected and action be taken for realisation of the amount paid to the petitioner in excess towards his salary. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.