JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE present contempt application has been preferred for the alleged
breach of an order passed by this Court dated 6 th November, 2009 in W.P.
(S) No. 6158 of 2007.
(2.) COUNSEL for the applicant (original petitioner) submitted that as per paragraph no. 19 of the order passed by this Court in earlier writ petition,
three directions were given. The first direction has already been complied
with. So far as second direction is concerned that was prospective in
nature and therefore, at this stage, he is not alleging the breach of the
second direction. Counsel for the applicant is alleging breach of the
direction given in paragraph 19(iii) of the aforesaid decision. It is
submitted by the counsel for the applicant that 6th Pay Revision should
have been given to the present applicant and the employees of opposite
partyZila Parishad, which they have not given and therefore, the present
contempt application has been preferred.
Counsel for the State submitted that a decision has already been taken by the State vide order dated 27th August, 2009, which is at
AnnexureA to the show cause filed by the Director, Panchayat Raj, State of
Jharkhand and in view of this decision, it has been stated that the Zila
Parishad is a separate autonomous body and as per their income, they
have to decide whether they are ready to give 6 th Pay Revision to their
employees or not?.
(3.) COUNSEL for opposite party nos. 4 and 5 i.e. Zila Parishad, Deoghar, submitted that they have also taken a decision dated 15 th March, 2011,
which is at AnnexureB series to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite
party nos. 4 and 5 and it has been stated that as the financial position of
opposite party nos. 4 and 5 are not sound enough they are not inclined to
give 6th Pay Revision at this stage, to their employees and as and when the
financial position will become sound they will give 6 th Pay Revision to their
employees. Thus, tentative decision has been taken on 15 th March,
2011 that at present the financial position is not good of opposite party nos. 4 and 5. Hence, 6th Pay Revision is not given to their employees.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.