JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) SINCE all the aforesaid four Cr.Appeals arose out of the
same impugned order they were tagged together so that the same be
heard together and be disposed of by the common order.
(2.) THE Cr.App.(S.J) No.1227 of 2004, Cr.App.(S.J) No.1233 of 2004 and Cr.App.(S.J) No.1241 of 2004 are being pressed on the ground that the parties have compromised the case but in Cr.App.(S.J)
No.1315 of 2004, the parties have not entered into a compromise and
therefore, Cr.App. (S.J) No.1315 of 2004 is hereby separated from
other three appeals.
All the aforesaid three appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 16.7.2004 passed in Sessions Trial
No.563 of 1995 as well as order of sentence whereby all the
appellants were convicted for the offences under Sections 452, 147
and 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for three years, one year and six months
respectively for the offences under Section 452, 147 and 323/149 of
the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) THE case of the prosecution is that in the evening of 25.9.1994 the appellant Raju Julka came along with one boy and after
ascertaining that the house belongs to Yuvaraj went away.
Subsequently, at 8.45 p.m. Indra Kumar Julka, his son Samair Julka
and Raju Julka along with 5 -6 boys came in their Ambassador car in
drunken state and got down from it and then entered into the house
and started searching for the informant, Manmohan Krishna (P.W.2)
with a view to kill him. When they came across with the informant, all
the accused persons started assaulting him. In that course, the
appellant, Raju Julka opened fire upon the informant from his pistol
but it got misfired. Meanwhile, when the family members Sunil Kumar
Mahendru (P.W.3) and Rakesh Kumar (P.W.1) tried to rescue the
informant, they were also assaulted, as a result of which, they
received injuries. In that course, one of the accused in order to kill the
informant's niece Sushma, throttled her neck. While this was
happening, alarm was raised, as a result of which, local people
assembled over there and then accused persons started fleeing from
there. However, one of the accused Jatin Sahay was apprehended,
who disclosed the name of his associates.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.