JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) IN I.A. no.3544 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) NO.3150 of 2013 in terms of the order passed by
this Court in W.P.(S) no.2194 of 2013{Ravindra Kumar Ojha & Ors.
Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.}.
Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner,
submitted that the case is exactly identical with the case, which has
been decided in the aforesaid writ petition and the instant writ
petition can be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court
in the aforesaid cases.
(2.) LEARNED J.C. to S.C.III, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has also accepted the said position and submitted that
the writ petition itself can be disposed of in terms of the order passed
by this Court in the aforesaid case.
In the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a
direction on the respondents to grant Grade-I scale to them from the
dates of their respective joining and all consequential benefits and
also to give promotion from Grade-I to Grade-IV, V etc.
The petitioners were appointed as untrained teachers by the Human Resources Development Department, Government of
Bihar in accordance with its policy decision and resolution dated
5.3.1991. The Government of Bihar had framed the Rules known as the Bihar Primary School Teachers' Rule, 1991 in exercise of its power
under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. In the said rule, there
was a provision for appointing the untrained teachers and after
appointment, for sending such teachers for in-service Teachers'
Training in the Government Colleges.
The petitioners were untrained Graduate and were
appointed in the year 1994 on the basis of the panel prepared after
completion of all the legal formalities. The Director, Primary Education,
Government of Bihar by Letter No. 998/95 dated 7.6.1995 had taken
decision to grant Grade-I scale of the Matric Trained to the untrained
teachers, who were Graduate. However, after appointment of
teachers, they were not sent for training. The appointment procedure
was challenged before the Patna High Court. The matter went up to
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P (Civil) No. 23187/1996 (Ram Vinay
Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) In the said S.L.P, the Supreme
Court gave certain direction to the State of Bihar for sending the
petitioners for in-service training. The Finance Department,
Government of Jharkhand by letter No. 4568 dated 5.7.2002 granted
Grade-I Matric Trained scale to such untrained teachers w.e.f
1.1.1996. It was also decided that the seniority position of the petitioners shall be maintained as per the merit list prepared at the
time of their appointment. However, the petitioners have been
stagnated in the same scale for more than 18 years without any
upgradation in the scale. Although the persons appointed with the
petitioners have been promoted from Grade-I scale to Grade-IV scale,
the petitioners have not been given even Grade-II scale. The
petitioners then filed representation through their Association, which
was rejected by the Government of Jharkhand observing that the
untrained teachers would not be entitled for promotion from Grade-I
scale to higher scale and that they would be entitled to Grade-I scale
only from the date of acquiring Teachers' Training certificate. The
petitioners are aggrieved by the said order.
(3.) AGAINST the said order, one Awadh Bihari Mishra and Ors. Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. had filed writ petition being W.P.(S)
no.5465 of 2007. The said writ petition was allowed and the appeal
being L.P.A. no.214 of 2008 against the said order was dismissed. The
SLA being SLA no.5520-5522 of 2013 was also dismissed by Hon'ble
Supreme Court.
The said legal position has not been disputed by learned
counsel for the respondents.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.