JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents pointed out that in all connected matters including in these matters,
the petitions have been entertained finding the position
that because of the circular issued by the Central
Government that in case where appellate authority or the
revisional authority has not passed any interim order
within a period of one month then recovery may be started
and this Court found that in most of the places in the entire
country the appellate authorities were not functional,
number of High Court already passed interim orders
against such recoveries. However, in these cases,
according to learned counsel for the respondents, the
petitioner's stay petitions have already been dismissed for
non-prosecution. Thereafter, their appeals were also
dismissed. The petitioner's then moved application for
restoration of the appeals, which are now pending and next
date fixed is 11th July, 2013. It is submitted that therefore
facts of these cases are entirely different and, therefore,
interim orders may be vacated and writ petitions may be
dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the connected petitions, which were also dismissed,
have been restored by the same authority, which are four
in number and these matters are likely to be taken on 11th
July, 2013. Therefore, in that situation, the stay may not be
vacated.
(3.) CONSIDERING the submission of learned counsel for the parties, we are disposing of these writ petitions
with directions to the CESTAT to decide the restoration
application of the writ petitioner on 11th July, 2013 or
within a reasonable period and if the petitioner's appeals
are restored by the CESTAT then petitioner's application
for interim relief, if appeal itself cannot be decided may be
considered and appropriate order may be passed and that
order shall be binding and interim order dated 7th
February, 2013 passed in these writ petitions shall
continue till any order is passed on restoration application
and if needed on petitioner's stay petition. It is expected
from the CESTAT that if the appeals of the writ petitioner
are restored then the stay petition will be considered, if
appeal are not decided, and it should not be beyond the
period of 30 days.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.