JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE petitioner has prayed for a direction on the
respondents to issue letter of appointment for the post of Driver
Constable for which he has been selected in the test held in
connection with Advertisement No.01 of 2009.
It has been submitted that the petitioner has all required
eligibility and he has passed through test. He holds valid driving
licence, but his appointment has been denied on the ground
that the driving licence has been issued after the appointed
date of 10th October, 2007 and that there is discrepancy in the
date of birth in driving licence and educational certificate.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
ground of denial of appointment is wholly frivolous and baseless.
The said ground has been mentioned without properly
examining the backside of the driving licence, which also forms
part of the licence. It has been submitted that the driving
licence was first issued on 28th December, 2005 much prior to 10th
October, 2007, but the respondents without examining the driving
licence have arbitrarily mentioned only the subsequent date of
renewal of licence on 21st April, 2009 and ignored the date of
licence first issued on 28th December, 2005. Learned counsel
further submitted that the petitioner is matriculate and in
matriculation certificate, his date of birth has been clearly
mentioned as 20th May, 1987. That document is authentic for the
purpose of determining the age. The discrepancy regarding
date of birth mentioned in the driving licence is a typographical
error and that should have been ignored in view of the entry of
his date of birth in the Matriculation certificate. Denial of
appointment on the said ground is, thus, wholly arbitrary and
unjust. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has filed
representation against the said denial of appointment, clarifying
the said position, but the same has not been considered and no
order has been passed till date.
(2.) LEARNED J.C. to A.G. appearing on behalf of the respondents opposed this writ petition on the ground, inter alia,
that there is discrepancy in the date of birth as mentioned in the
educational certificate and the driving licence and the
petitioner's candidature was rejected in view of the said
discrepancy. Learned counsel, however, submitted that if any
representation explaining the discrepancy is pending or if the
petitioner files a fresh representation before the Senior
Superintendent of PolicecumChairman, Selection Board (Driver
Constable, Ranchi, the same shall be considered and
appropriate order shall be passed.
Considering the above facts and the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of,
giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation,
regarding his grievance, before the Senior Superintendent of
PolicecumChairman, Selection Board (Driver Constable,
RanchiRespondent No.3. On receipt of representation, the said
respondent shall consider the same and examine the relevant
documents and pass appropriate order, within six weeks from the
date of receipt of the representation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.