MANORMA SINGH Vs. RAMJHARI DEVI
LAWS(JHAR)-2013-6-78
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on June 20,2013

MANORMA SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
RAMJHARI DEVI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) BY Court Heard learned counsel for the appellant, ignoring the defects, in view of the urgency shown by the learned counsel for the appellant.
(2.) THE learned counsel for the appellant submitted that due to the reasons mentioned in the application being I.A. No. 330 of 2013, the appellant could not prefer Letters Patent Appeal and as such the delay may be condoned. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 330 of 2013 stands disposed of.
(3.) HEARD on the merits of the case.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.