JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE petitioner filed Title Suit No. 141 of 1998, against the opposite parties for declaration of title, confirmation of possession over the suit land, detailed in Schedule 'A ' to the plaint and
for permanent injunction restraining them from going over it as also for mandatory injunction to
demolish the construction of rooms and boundary wall made by them. On 4.9.1998, a petition for
interim injunction was filed by him for restraining them from disturbing his possession over the suit
land -Schedule A.
(2.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the then landlord by patta dated 26.3.1944, made raiyati settlement of the suit land in favour of one Jageshwar Singh. By registered sale deed dated 11.5.1982, the
heirs of late Jageshwar Singh and his brother sold 5 kathas out of total 20 kathas land of plot No.
117 to the petitioner 'sson Anand Kishore Singh, which is described in Schedule 'B ' to the plaint. Subsequently, they sold the remaining 15 kathas to the petitioner by
registered sale deed dated 19.6.1982, Anand Kishore Singh died thereafter and hence the
petitioner inherited the said 5 kathas, being his class -1 heir. On the petitioner 'sabsence, the
opposite parties 1 to 6 encroached upon the Schedule 'B ' land and constructed rooms
and boundary wall some time in October, 1998.
Opposite parties 1 and 2, on the other hand, claimed their possession over 68 decimals land of plot No. 117 for more than 50 years and thereby perfection of title by adverse possession thereon.
Opposite party No. 3 claimed his peaceful possession over 13 decimals land of the said plot and
settlement thereof by the State Government made in his favour in the year 1988 and the opposite
parties 4 to 6 claimed 10 decimals thereof to have obtained in raiyati settlement by the father of
the opposite party No. 4 by patta dated 5.4.1993, from the then landlord.
(3.) THE trial Court observed that the plaintiff, on the one hand, accepted to have been dispossessed from the Schedule 'B ' land and on the other sought for interim injunction
for disturbing his possession over the entire Schedule 'A ' land, which consisted the
Schedule 'B ' land also.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.