RAM LAKHAN PRASAD AND ORS. Vs. MALTI DEVI AND ORS.
LAWS(JHAR)-2003-1-157
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on January 24,2003

Ram Lakhan Prasad And Ors. Appellant
VERSUS
Malti Devi And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J. - (1.) THE plaintiffs are the appellants. The appeal is against the judgment of reversal. The plaintiffs suit being title suit No. 97/88 for declaration of right title, interest and possession has been decreed by the Munsif, Daltonganj, Palamau.
(2.) THE appeal, filed by the defendant respondent being Title Appeal No. 4/92, the appellate Court by the impugned judgment and decree reversed the judgment passed by the Munsif and dismissed the suit and allowed the appeal. The aforementioned suit was instituted by the plaintiff in respect of upper half portion of house standing on Khas Mahal plot No. 227 bearing Khas Mahal holding No. 113 situated at Rahat Road, Daltonganj. The undisputed fact is that the suit property was purchased by joint family of which late Babu Brij Bihari Lal and Baveri Lal were members of the family. In the year 1952 a partition suit was instituted which was registered as partition suit No. 45/52 and in the said suit a decree for partition on the basis of compromise was passed and the suit property was allotted in the Takhta of the plaintiffs. They Jointly became the owners of the entire holding. The plaintiffs farther case is that the defendant is the own sister's son of plaintiff No. 1 who was the resident of Aurangabad. In 1956 he got employment in the local college as librarian and he had rib house of his own at Daltonganj. So he approached the plaintiff for allowing him to reside in the suit premises. Accordingly it is alleged by the plaintiff that the defendant was permitted to occupy the premises. When the defendant was asked to vacated the premises he alleged to have avoided the same on one pretext or other which necessitated the filing of the suit.
(3.) THE defendant's case on the other hand, is that he is occupying the suit premises on his own right. According to the defendant the suit is barred by limitation and adverse possession. The defendant denied the title of the plaintiffs and took the stand that the suit property exclusively belongs to him and he has been occupying the same openly since last several years with his right title and interest with full knowledge of the plaintiff.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.