M.Y. Eqbal., J. - (1.) THE members of the petitioner -Society are the erstwhile employees of the respondent -Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) having superannuated under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) and they are in occupation of the quarters of the Corporation on payment of market rent. On the basis of these fact the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 1.11.2000 issued to one of the members of the petitioner - Society asking him to vacate the quarter within 30 days and after clearing the outstanding dues failing which a proceeding for eviction shall be initiated.
(2.) THE admitted facts are that on 13.1.1999 an office order was issued by the Corporation intimating that the Management had decided to charge market rent for all the quarters allotted to the employees on leave and license basis including the outsiders and the employees who took voluntary retirement under Voluntary Retirement Scheme. In 1999 another office order was issued by the Corporation vide circular dated 23.9.1998 whereby it was decided that the employees who have superannuated under Voluntary Retirement Scheme shall be allowed to retain their quarters pending payment of their retiral benefits including all admissible dues. On the basis of the said office order/circular the petitioner -society claims that its members are not liable to be evicted unless they are paid their retiral dues namely LTA for the period 1992 -93. The case of the respondent -Corporation, on the other hand, is that Annexure -4 which dated 13.9.1998 is not a circular rather it is a decision taken by the Core Committee which was never given the shape of a circular. It is contended that although in the meeting it was decided that till such payment is made for the period 1992 -1993 to the employees who have retired under Voluntary Retirement Scheme, the quarters given on leave and license basis may be allowed to be retained by them on leave and license basis. It is further stated in the counter -affidavit that the General Secretary and the President of the present association earlier moved this Court for the self -same relief in CWJC No. 852/1998 (R) challenging the circular dated 13.1.1999 which was dismissed and the matter ultimately reached upto the Supreme Court in SLP No. (Civil) No. 13735/2000 which is pending.
(3.) I have heard Mr. S.K. Ughal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Mukhopadhaya, learned counsel for the respondent - Corp oration.;