JUDGEMENT
VISHNUDEO NARAYAN, J. -
(1.) THIS appeal has been directed by the appellants named above against the impugned judgment and order dated 11.10.1993 and 14.10.1993 respectively passed in Sessions Case No. 50 of
1988/4 of 1991 by Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Godda whereby and whereunder appellant Jai Narayan Bhagat was found guilty for the offence punishable under
Sections 326, 323, 148 of the Indian Penal Code and he was convicted and sentenced to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years, six months and one year respectively and also to
pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/ - and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and
rest of the appellants named above were found guilty for the offense punishable under Sections
326/149, 323 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code and each of them was convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years, six months and one year respectively and also to pay a fine
of Rs. 1,000/ - and a default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. However, the
sentences were ordered to run concurrently. All the appellants were acquitted for the offence
punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
(2.) THE prosecution case has arisen on the basis of the fardbeyan of PW 2 Satyanarayan Lal Srivastava, the informant, recorded on 27.10.1984 at 17.00 hours by PW 3 Madan Mohan
Sharma, SI Mahagama PS. in the paddy field of one Tribhuwan Lai Srivastava situate south of
Bindi Bahiyar in village -Beldiha about the occurrence of that very day and the case was instituted
against the appellants vide drawing of the formal FIR on 28.10.1984 at 6.30 hours.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that all the appellants caught PW 2 Satyanarayan Lal Srivastava, the informant west of village Shahpur on 27.10.1984 in the morning and they brought
him at the door of one Jagdeo Bhagat @ Budhi Bhagat where they assaulted him by lathi and kick
and thereafter by garasa as a result of which he sustained severe injuries on his hand, leg, back
and eye. It is alleged that appellant Jai Narayan Bhagat had caused injuries on his person by
garasa and the rest of the appellants have assaulted him by lathi and thereafter they lifted him and
threw him in the paddy field of Tribhuwan Lal Srivastava. It is also alleged that the appellants have
assaulted him due to an incident which has taken place on 26.10.1984 at 15.30 hours in which he
has ravished Parabhi Kumari, daughter of Ramdeo Bhagat in that very Paddy field.
(3.) THE appellants have pleaded not guilty to the charges levelled against them and they claim themselves to be innocent and to have committed no offense and that they have been falsely
implicated in this case due to admitted enmity and also as they are of the caste of Parabhi Kumari
aforesaid.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.