LAL MADHUSUDAN NATH SHADEO Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
LAWS(JHAR)-2003-4-53
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on April 08,2003

Lal Madhusudan Nath Shadeo Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

VIKRAMADITYA PRASAD, J. - (1.) THE question to be answered in this writ is whether lease holder petitioner, who sought approval for transfer of the lease to another person but did not execute the deed of transfer, is liable to pay the mining dues including the dead rent etc. against the mining lease?
(2.) THE petitioner was a mining lease holder under the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules. The petitioners case is that the approval of the Collector was sought for transfer of the mining lease and that approval was granted by the Collector and before obtaining that approval, the respondent No. 4 had sworn an affidavit, by which he undertook to fulfill all formalities concerning mining lease. By Annexure -6 respondent State raised demand for dues against the petitioner and the petitioner seeks quashing of Annexure -6 on the ground that the lease stood transferred to respondent No. 4. Approval for transfer and transfer are two different things. A question arises when the transfer becomes complete. In this context, covenants of lease are relevant to be looked into. Covenants are contained in Form D under Rule 21 of the Rules. Clause 13, Part -VII of the Rules read as follows : - - "13. Liberty to assign or transfer his rights. - -The lessee/lessees may assign this lease or transfer any right, title or interest hereunder by outright sale to a person approved by the Collector, with the previous written sanction for the Collector on payment of a fee of Rs. 1,000/ -. The lessee/lessees shall not allow this lease or any right, title or interest hereunder to be attached or sold in compliance with any decree or order of a Court or Revenue Officer; provided that the assignment or transfer as aforesaid the instrument thereof shall be registered within three calendar months from the date of its completion. The lessee/lessees shall not however sub -lease or sub -let any right, title or interest in this lease." Form C under Rule 17 is a register of Mining Lease, which in its column (a) (ix) speaks of the date of assignment or transfer of the lease. From perusal of the Clause 13 aforesaid, it is clear that after approval, the lease has to be transferred by a registered deed within three months from the date of its completion. No deed of transfer of lease either executed by the State or by the petitioner in favour of the respondent No. 4 has been produced by the petitioner or respondent State. No Annexure has been annexed in the States counter - affidavit to show that in the Register of Mining Lease in column (ix) aforesaid, the date of transfer has been entered into.
(3.) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioner says that after approval was granted by the Collector, it was the duty of the contemplated transferee to get the deed of transfer registered or it was an affair between the State and the contemplated transferee and the petitioner -lessee had nothing to do as he became third petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.