JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner is
absent.
(2.) This application has been preferred under Sections 439 and 440 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with the offence registered with
Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 54 of 2009, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 661 of 2009
(T.R. No. 821 of 2010), for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 511
of the Indian Penal Code, Section 25(1 B)A/26/33 of the Arms Act.
(3.) I have heard learned A.P.P., appearing on behalf of the State, who has
submitted that previously preferred bail application being B.A. No. 3238 of
2009 was dismissed on merit by this Court vide order dated 23
rd
May, 2009.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.