JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application is directed against the order dated 15.3.2004
passed in Cr.Rev.No.74 of 2001 whereby learned Sessions Judge, Lohardaga
set aside the order passed in Misc. case no.13 of 1998 whereby the petitioner
was awarded maintenance of Rs.500/- per month.
(2.) The petitioner by claiming herself to be the wife of opposite party no.2
Hari Uraon filed an application under Section 125 of he Code of Criminal
Procedure before the learned Magistrate stating therein that she was married to
Hari Uraon 12 years before. Out of their wedlock, three children born but in
course of time, Hari Uraon started neglecting her and ultimately, threw her out of
the house.
(3.) Harii Uraon the opposite party on putting his appearance submitted show
cause wherein it has been stated that the petitioner Rajmani Devi never
happens tobe his wife and that he is already married from before and does have
two children from his wife Somari Uraon and therefore, the question of marring
Rajmani Devi during subsistence of the marriage with his wife never arises as
under the customs of Uraon 2
nd
marriage is not permissible if the person is
having issue from the first wife.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.